Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments

被引:72
作者
Arora, N [1 ]
Huber, J
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/322902
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We propose aggregate customization as an approach to improve individual estimates using a hierarchical Bayes choice model. Our approach involves the use of prior estimates to build a common design customized for the average respondent. We conduct two simulation studies to investigate conditions that are most conducive to aggregate customization. The simulations are validated by a field study showing that aggregate customization results in better estimates of individual parameters and more accurate predictions of individuals' choices. The proposed approach is easy to use, and a simulation study can assess the expected benefit from aggregate customization prior to its implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 283
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   INCORPORATING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE INTO THE ANALYSIS OF CONJOINT STUDIES [J].
ALLENBY, GM ;
ARORA, N ;
GINTER, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (02) :152-162
[2]   On the heterogeneity of demand [J].
Allenby, GM ;
Arora, N ;
Ginter, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (03) :384-389
[3]  
ALLENBY GM, 1998, DESIGNING INFORMATIV
[4]   A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM ;
Ginter, JL .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :29-44
[5]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand
[6]  
BUNCH DS, 1994, COMPARISON EXPT DESI
[7]  
Carson R.T., 1994, MARKET LETT, V5, P351, DOI [10.1007/BF00999210, DOI 10.1007/BF00999210]
[8]  
CASSELLA G, 1990, STAT INFERENCE
[9]   UNDERSTANDING THE METROPOLIS-HASTINGS ALGORITHM [J].
CHIB, S ;
GREENBERG, E .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1995, 49 (04) :327-335
[10]   AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF RATINGS-BASED AND CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT MODELS [J].
ELROD, T ;
LOUVIERE, JJ ;
DAVEY, KS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (03) :368-377