Cross-reactions of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates

被引:48
作者
Kanerva, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Dermatol Sect, FIN-00250 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
acrylate; acrylic monomers; animal study; asthma; cross-reactivity; dentistry; 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate; multifunctional methacrylate; occupational dermatitis; sensitization;
D O I
10.1080/000163501750541200
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Dental acrylic monomers (that is, acrylates and methacrylates) are important Occupational sensitizers. Acrylic monomers may also cause allergic reactions in dental care. Unfortunately, acrylic monomers crossreact-that is, allergic sensitization induced by one acrylic compound extends to one or more other acrylic compounds. therefore, sensitized individuals are often multiallergic and, accordingly, cannot be exposed to any of the compounds. In the present review aspects of cross-reactivity in general and data from animal studies of cross-reactivity of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates are summarized. A multitude of acrylic monomers is used in dentistry, and when patients or dental personnel become sensitized, it is of great importance to identify the dental acrylic preparations to which the sensitized individual can be exposed. Sensitized dental workers are known to have ceased working in dentistry owing to occupational allergic contact dermatitis or asthma, caused by dental acrylic monomers. Unfortunately, cross-reactivity of acrylic monomers used in dentistry is not sufficiently mapped to enable selection of an appropriate compound for the sensitized person. Another important aspect is that product declarations of dental acrylic materials should show all acrylic compounds present in the products-even acrylic monomers/impurities with lower concentrations than 1%. This could help to select a product that the sensitized individual could use.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 329
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Baer RL., 1954, MODERN TRENDS DERMAT, P232
[2]  
BASKETTER D, 2000, OCCUPATIONAL DERMATO, P395
[3]   THE SENSITIZING CAPACITY OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL ACRYLATES IN THE GUINEA-PIG [J].
BJORKNER, B .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1984, 11 (04) :236-246
[4]  
BJORKNER B, 1989, ARBETE HALSA, V20, P1
[5]   SENSITIZATION POTENTIALS OF METHYL, ETHYL, AND NORMAL-BUTYL METHACRYLATES AND MUTUAL CROSS-SENSITIVITY IN GUINEA-PIGS [J].
CHUNG, CW ;
GILES, AL .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1977, 68 (04) :187-190
[6]  
DUPUIS G, 1982, ALLERGIC CONTACT DER, P87
[7]   Contact sensitivity to selected acrylate compounds in B6C3F1 mice: Relative potency, cross reactivity, and comparison of test methods. [J].
Hayes, BB ;
Meade, BJ .
DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1999, 22 (03) :491-506
[8]  
Henriks-Eckerman M L, 1997, Am J Contact Dermat, V8, P20, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(97)90030-0
[9]   Product analysis of acrylic resins compared to information given in material safety data sheets [J].
HenriksEckerman, ML ;
Kanerva, L .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (03) :164-165
[10]  
Jordan W P Jr, 1975, Contact Dermatitis, V1, P13, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05304.x