European allergen extract units and potency: review of available information

被引:93
作者
Larenas-Linnemann, Desiree [1 ]
Cox, Linda S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Med Sur, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Nova SE Univ, Sch Osteopath Med, Davie, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60422-X
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: There is considerable variability in how allergen extract potency is measured and reported worldwide. In Europe, where many sublingual immunotherapy studies have been conducted, manufacturers report allergen extract potency as units based on an in-house reference, making it difficult to understand the exact doses used and to compare studies. Objectives: To describe the various methods of expressing extract potency that European allergen extract manufacturers use and to gather reports on the micrograms of major allergen of the in-house units of European allergen extract manufacturers. Methods: Information was derived from 3 sources: data on extract potency in micrograms of major allergen in articles on sublingual immunotherapy found by PubMed (references through October 2005) and in reference articles, brochures on allergen extracts from the manufacturers, and information provided by structured questionnaires e-mailed to the manufacturers. Results: All but 1 of the European allergen extract manufacturers use in-house reference standards that are based on titrated skin prick testing of allergic patients. Subsequently, in vitro tests compare the potency of commercial batches with the in-house reference and potency is assigned as arbitrary units. Most manufacturers measure major allergen content of their standardized products but do not release this information with the package insert. Diversity in major allergen content was found. Conclusions: Micrograms of major allergens given in articles on sublingual immunotherapy to express the dose administered cannot be used to translate the dose to US extracts. Extract potency can only be compared if uniform test methods and reference extracts are used.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 145
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Allen-Diaz B, 1998, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V53, P42
[2]  
ALVAREZCUESTA E, 2006, ALLERGY, V82, pS14
[3]  
Boluda L, 1998, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V8, P207
[4]   Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma [J].
Bousquet, J ;
van Cauwenberge, P ;
Khaltaev, N ;
Ait-Khaled, N ;
Annesi-Maesano, I ;
Bachert, C ;
Baena-Cagnani, C ;
Bateman, E ;
Bonini, S ;
Canonica, GW ;
Carlsen, KH ;
Demoly, P ;
Durham, SR ;
Enarson, D ;
Fokkens, WJ ;
van Wijk, RG ;
Howarth, P ;
Ivanova, NA ;
Kemp, JP ;
Klossek, JM ;
Lockey, RF ;
Lund, V ;
Mackay, I ;
Malling, HJ ;
Meltzer, EO ;
Mygind, N ;
Okunda, M ;
Pawankar, R ;
Price, D ;
Scadding, GK ;
Simons, FER ;
Szczeklik, A ;
Valovirta, E ;
Vignola, AM ;
Wang, DY ;
Warner, JO ;
Weiss, KB .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 108 (05) :S147-S334
[5]   Canadian trial of sublingual swallow immunotherapy for ragweed rhinoconjunctivitis [J].
Bowen, T ;
Greenbaum, J ;
Charbonneau, Y ;
Herbert, J ;
Filderman, R ;
Sussman, G ;
Del Carpio, J ;
Gold, M ;
Keith, P ;
Moote, W ;
Cecchetto, S ;
Cecchetto, O ;
Sharp, D ;
Broutin, O ;
André, C .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 93 (05) :425-430
[6]   Efficacy of sublingual swallow immunotherapy in children with severe grass pollen allergic symptoms: a double-blind placebo-controlled study [J].
Bufe, A ;
Ziegler-Kirbach, E ;
Stoeckmann, E ;
Heidemann, P ;
Gehlhar, K ;
Holland-Letz, T ;
Braun, W .
ALLERGY, 2004, 59 (05) :498-504
[7]   Monoclonal antibodies against the major allergen of Plantago lanceolata pollen, Pla 1 1:: affinity chromatography purification of the allergen and development of an ELISA method for Pla 1 1 measurement [J].
Calabozo, B ;
Duffort, O ;
Carpizo, JA ;
Barber, D ;
Polo, F .
ALLERGY, 2001, 56 (05) :429-435
[8]   COMPARISON OF SKIN-PRICK TEST ASSAY AND REVERSE ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY COMPETITION (REINA-C) FOR BIOLOGICAL-ACTIVITY OF ALLERGENS [J].
CASANOVAS, M ;
MARANON, F ;
BEL, I .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1994, 24 (02) :134-139
[9]   Biologic activity of Dermatophagoides siboney and Blomia tropicalis allergens in exposed and unexposed mite-allergic individuals.: Effect of patient selection on the biologic standardization of mite extracts [J].
Casas, R ;
Ferrándiz, R ;
Wihl, JÅ ;
Fernández, B ;
Dreborg, S .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (04) :392-396
[10]   Sublingual immunotherapy: A comprehensive review [J].
Cox, Linda S. ;
Linnemann, Desiree Larenas ;
Nolte, Hendrik ;
Weldon, David ;
Finegold, Ira ;
Nelson, Harold S. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 117 (05) :1021-1035