Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction

被引:17
作者
Hünerbein, M [1 ]
Stroszczynski, C [1 ]
Ulmer, C [1 ]
Handke, T [1 ]
Felix, R [1 ]
Schlag, PM [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Surg & Surg Oncol, D-13122 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02302-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of transcutaneous three-dimensional US cholangiography to depict the biliary tree in malignant obstruction, compared with that of MRCP and direct cholangiography. Methods: Three-dimensional US and MRCP and direct cholangiography were performed in 40 patients with suspected malignant biliary obstruction. Diagnostic quality of the images, presence, level, and cause of ductal obstruction were assessed in a prospective, blinded fashion. The results were correlated with consensus interpretation (3 investigators), intra-operative findings, and histopathology or clinical follow-up. Results: Three-dimensional US produced cholangiographic images of diagnostic quality. The appearance of these images was similar to that of MRCP or ERCP/percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography images. All modalities were highly sensitive in the detection of biliary dilatation. The accuracy of 3-dimensional US, MRCP, and ERCP/percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in determining the level of obstruction was, respectively, 92%, 95%, and 98%. Transcutaneous 3-dimensional US and MRCP accurately identified the cause of obstruction in, respectively, 90% and 95% of cases. Direct cholangiography revealed the correct diagnosis in 95% of the patients. Conclusions: Three-dimensional US cholangiography is a new, noninvasive method with the capability to produce diagnostic cholangiograms. Three-dimensional US cholangiography may be used increasingly as an initial test to select patients who require further diagnostic evaluation by MRCP or therapeutic ERCP.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 858
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Interobserver agreement among endosonographers for the diagnosis of neoplastic versus non-neoplastic pancreatic cystic lesions [J].
Ahmad, NA ;
Kochman, ML ;
Brensinger, C ;
Brugge, WR ;
Faigel, DO ;
Gress, FG ;
Kimmey, MB ;
Nickl, NJ ;
Savides, TJ ;
Wallace, MB ;
Wiersema, MJ ;
Ginsberg, GG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :59-64
[2]   Current concepts - Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography [J].
Barish, MA ;
Yucel, EK ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (04) :258-264
[3]  
Baron TH, 2002, MAYO CLIN PROC, V77, P407
[4]  
BLACKBOURNE LH, 1994, AM SURGEON, V60, P683
[5]   Medical progress: Pancreatic and biliary endoscopy [J].
Brugge, WR ;
Van Dam, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (24) :1808-1816
[6]   The latest in ultrasound: three-dimensional imaging. Part 1 [J].
Candiani, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 :S179-S182
[7]   Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis [J].
Canto, MIF ;
Chak, A ;
Stellato, T ;
Sivak, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (06) :439-448
[8]  
Eisen GM, 2001, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V53, P849
[9]   Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: A novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms [J].
Feldman, DR ;
Kulling, DP ;
Kay, CL ;
Cole, DJ ;
Cunningham, JT ;
Hawes, RH ;
Tarnasky, PR ;
Cotton, PB ;
Baron, PL .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 4 (08) :634-638
[10]   MRI and MRCP in pancreaticobiliary malignancy [J].
Ferrucci, JT .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 :18-19