A simplified prognostic system for resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

被引:55
作者
Ballian, Nikiforos
Loeffler, Agnes G. [2 ]
Rajamanickam, Victoria
Norstedt, Peter A.
Weber, Sharon M.
Cho, Clifford S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sect Surg Oncol, Dept Surg, Clin Sci Ctr H4 724,Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Pathol, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
neuroendocrine; pancreas; surgery; prognostication;
D O I
10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00082.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: A number of prognostically relevant clinicopathological variables have been proposed for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, a standardized prognostication system has yet to be established for patients undergoing potentially curative tumour resection. Methods: We examined a prospectively maintained, single-institution database to identify patients who underwent potentially curative resection of non-metastatic primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Patient, operative and pathological characteristics were analysed to identify variables associated with disease-specific and disease-free survival. Results: Between 1991 and 2007, 43 patients met inclusion criteria. After a median follow-up of 68 months, 5-year disease-specific survival was 94% and 5-year disease-free survival was 72%. Tumours sized >= 5 cm and vascular invasion were associated with worse disease-specific survival. Tumours sized >= 5 cm, nodal metastases, positive resection margins and perineural invasion were associated with worse disease-free survival. A scoring system consisting of tumour size >= 5 cm, histological grade, nodal metastases and resection margin positivity (SGNM) permitted stratification of disease-specific (P = 0.006) and disease-free (P = 0.0004) survival. This proposed scoring system demonstrated excellent discrimination of individual disease-specific and disease-free survival outcomes as reflected by concordance indices of 0.814 and 0.794, respectively. Conclusions: A simple scoring system utilizing tumour size, histological grade, nodal metastases and resection margin status can be used to stratify outcomes in patients undergoing resection of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 428
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours [J].
Alexakis, N. ;
Neoptolemos, J. P. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) :183-205
[2]
[Anonymous], J GASTROINTEST SURG
[3]
The elderly benefit from identifying 12 lymph nodes for colon cancer? [J].
Bilimoria, Karl ;
Stewart, Andrew ;
Bentrem, David ;
Palis, Bryan ;
Talamonti, Mark ;
Ko, Clifford .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 205 (03) :S42-S42
[4]
Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [J].
Brennan, MF ;
Kattan, MW ;
Klimstra, D ;
Conlon, K .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :293-298
[5]
CAPELLA C, 1995, VIRCHOWS ARCH, V425, P547
[6]
Histologic grade is correlated with outcome after resection of hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms [J].
Cho, Clifford S. ;
Labow, Daniel M. ;
Tang, Laura ;
Klimstra, David S. ;
Loeffler, Agnes G. ;
Leverson, Glen E. ;
Fong, Yuman ;
Jarnagin, William R. ;
D'Angelica, Michael I. ;
Weber, Sharon M. ;
Blumgart, Leslie H. ;
DeMatteo, Ronald R. .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (01) :126-134
[7]
A novel prognostic nomogram is more accurate than conventional staging systems for predicting survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Cho, Clifford S. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Shia, Jinru ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Klimstra, David S. ;
Jarnagin, William R. ;
D'Angelica, Michael I. ;
Blumgart, Leslie H. ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (02) :281-291
[8]
ECKHAUSER FE, 1986, SURGERY, V100, P978
[9]
Determining prognosis in patients with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: Can the WHO classification system be simplified? [J].
Ferrone, Cristina R. ;
Tang, Laura H. ;
Tomlinson, James ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Hochwald, Steven N. ;
Brennan, Murray F. ;
Klimstra, David S. ;
Allen, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (35) :5609-5615
[10]
Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO