Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology

被引:138
作者
Desch, CE [1 ]
Benson, AB [1 ]
Smith, TJ [1 ]
Flynn, PJ [1 ]
Krause, C [1 ]
Loprinzi, CL [1 ]
Minsky, BD [1 ]
Petrelli, NJ [1 ]
Pfister, DG [1 ]
Somerfield, MR [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Soc Clin Oncol, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1312
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the most effective, evidence based, postoperative surveillance strategy for the detection of recurrent colon and rectal cancer. Tests are to be recommended only if they have an impact on the outcomes listed below. Potential Intervention: All tests described in the literature for postoperative monitoring were considered. In addition, the data were critically evaluated to determine the optimal frequency of monitoring. Outcomes: Outcomes of interest included overall and disease free survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction, and cost-effectiveness. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Expert Panel was guided by the principle of cost minimization, ie, when two strategies were believed to be equally effective, the least expensive test was recommended. Evidence: A complete MEDLINE search was performed of the past 20 years of the medical literature, Keywords included colorectal cancer, follow-up, and carcinoembryonic antigen, as well as the names of the specific tests. The search was broadened by articles from the tumor marker ASCO panel literature search, as well as from bibliographies of selected articles. Values: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were rated by a standard process. More weight was given to studies that tested a hypothesis directly relating testing to one of the primary outcomes in a randomized design. Benefits/Harms/Costs: The possible consequences of false-positive and false-negative tests were considered in evaluating a preference for one of two tests that provide similar information. Cost alone was not a determining factor Recommendations: The expert panel's recommended postoperative monitoring schemer is discussed in this article. Validation: Five outside reviewers, the ASCO Health Services Research Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors examined this document. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1321
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   ACCURACY OF FECAL OCCULT BLOOD SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY USING HEMOCCULT AND HEMOQUANT TESTS [J].
AHLQUIST, DA ;
WIEAND, HS ;
MOERTEL, CG ;
MCGILL, DB ;
LOPRINZI, CL ;
OCONNELL, MJ ;
MAILLIARD, JA ;
GERSTNER, JB ;
PANDYA, K ;
ELLEFSON, RD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (10) :1262-1267
[2]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND SURVIVAL WITH CONTINUOUS HEPATIC-ARTERY FLOXURIDINE INFUSION FOR COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES [J].
ALLENMERSH, TG ;
EARLAM, S ;
FORDY, C ;
ABRAMS, K ;
HOUGHTON, J .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8932) :1255-1260
[3]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1996, CANC FACTS FIG 1996
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J Clin Oncol, V14, P671
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, J CLIN ONCOL, V12, P2471
[6]  
ARNAUD JP, 1992, SPEC INT COL M SURG, V25
[7]  
Bast RC, 1996, J CLIN ONCOL, V14, P2843
[8]   FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BRUINVELS, DJ ;
STIGGELBOUT, AM ;
KIEVIT, J ;
VANHOUWELINGEN, HC ;
HABBEMA, JDF ;
VANDEVELDE, CJH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 219 (02) :174-182
[9]  
COOK DJ, 1992, CHEST, V102, pS305
[10]   Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Pyrhönen, S ;
James, RD ;
Punt, CJA ;
Hickish, TF ;
Heikkila, R ;
Johannesen, TB ;
Starkhammar, H ;
Topham, CA ;
Awad, L ;
Jacques, C ;
Herait, P .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9138) :1413-1418