Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach-avoidance motions

被引:152
作者
Seibt, Beate [1 ]
Neumann, Roland [2 ]
Nussinson, Ravit [4 ]
Strack, Fritz [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Social & Org Psychol, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Dortmund, Dept Psychol, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Wurzburg, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Univ Haifa, IIPDM, IL-31999 Haifa, Israel
关键词
approach and avoidance behavior; prejudice; implicit measures; compatibility effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.013
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Based on the conceptualization of approach as a decrease in distance and avoidance as an increase in distance, we predicted that stimuli with positive valence facilitate behavior for either approaching the stimulus (object as reference point) or for bringing the stimulus closer (self as reference point) and that stimuli with negative valence facilitate behavior for withdrawing from the stimulus or for pushing the stimulus away. In Study 1, we found that motions to and from a computer screen where positive and negative words were presented lead to compatibility effects indicative of an object-related frame of reference. In Study 2, we replicated this finding using social stimuli with different evaluative associations (young vs. old persons). Finally, we present evidence that self vs. object reference points can be induced through instruction and thus lead to opposite compatibility effects even when participants make the same objective motion (Study 3). (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 720
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus [J].
Chen, M ;
Bargh, JA .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1999, 25 (02) :215-224
[2]   On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals [J].
Dasgupta, N ;
Greenwald, AG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (05) :800-814
[3]   On the generality of the affective Simon effect [J].
De Houwer, J ;
Crombez, G ;
Baeyens, F ;
Hermans, D .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2001, 15 (02) :189-206
[4]   As time goes by:: Evidence for two systems in processing space→time metaphors [J].
Gentner, D ;
Imai, M ;
Boroditsky, L .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2002, 17 (05) :537-565
[5]   EMOTION, ATTENTION, AND THE STARTLE REFLEX [J].
LANG, PJ ;
BRADLEY, MM ;
CUTHBERT, BN .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (03) :377-395
[6]  
Lewin K., 1936, DYNAMIC THEORY PERS
[7]   Constraining theories of embodied cognition [J].
Markman, AB ;
Brendl, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (01) :6-10
[8]   Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence [J].
Mogg, K ;
Bradley, BP ;
Field, M ;
De Houwer, J .
ADDICTION, 2003, 98 (06) :825-836
[9]   Automatic stimulus-goal comparisons: Support from motivational affective priming studies [J].
Moors, A ;
De Houwer, J ;
Eelen, P .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2004, 18 (01) :29-54
[10]   Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information [J].
Neumann, R ;
Strack, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (01) :39-48