Transversus Abdominis Plane Block A Systematic Review

被引:180
作者
Abdallah, Faraj W. [1 ]
Chan, Vincent W. [1 ]
Brull, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; CESAREAN DELIVERY; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; PAIN RELIEF; EFFICACY; SURGERY; APPENDECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182429531
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Ultrasound guidance has led a surge of interest in transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery. Despite or because of the numerous descriptive applications and techniques that have recently populated the literature, results of comparative studies for TAP block have been inconsistent. This systematic review pragmatically addresses many unanswered questions, specifically the following: what are the effects of surgical procedure, block dose, block technique, and block timing on TAP block analgesia? Eighteen intermediate- to good-quality randomized trials that included diverse surgical procedures were identified. Improved analgesia was noted in patients undergoing laparotomy for colorectal surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open and laparoscopic appendectomy. There was a trend toward superior analgesic outcomes when 15 mL of local anesthetic or morewas used per side compared with lesser volumes. All 5 trials investigating TAP block performed in the triangle of Petit and 7 of 12 trials performed along the midaxillary line demonstrated some analgesic advantages. Eight of 9 trials using preincisional TAP block and 4 of 9 with postincisional block revealed better analgesic outcomes. Although the majority of trials reviewed suggest superior early pain control, we were unable to definitively identify the surgical procedures, dosing, techniques, and timing that provide optimal analgesia following TAP block. This review suggests that our understanding of the TAP block and its role in contemporary practice remains limited. (Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:193-209)
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 209
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   Comparison between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair [J].
Aveline, C. ;
Le Hetet, H. ;
Le Roux, A. ;
Vautier, P. ;
Cognet, F. ;
Vinet, E. ;
Tison, C. ;
Bonnet, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (03) :380-386
[3]  
Baaj Jumana M., 2010, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, V20, P821
[4]   Spread of injectate after ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric study [J].
Barrington, M. J. ;
Ivanusic, J. J. ;
Rozen, W. M. ;
Hebbard, P. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (07) :745-750
[5]   Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery [J].
Belavy, D. ;
Cowlishaw, P. J. ;
Howes, M. ;
Phillips, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (05) :726-730
[6]   The Efficacy of a Novel Approach to Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Colorectal Surgery [J].
Bharti, Neerja ;
Kumar, Parag ;
Bala, Indu ;
Gupta, Vikas .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (06) :1504-1508
[7]   Transversus abdominis plane block: what is its role in postoperative analgesia? [J].
Bonnet, F. ;
Berger, J. ;
Aveline, C. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 103 (04) :468-470
[8]   Studies on the spread of local anaesthetic solution in transversus abdominis plane blocks [J].
Carney, J. ;
Finnerty, O. ;
Rauf, J. ;
Bergin, D. ;
Laffey, J. G. ;
Mc Donnell, J. G. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (11) :1023-1030
[9]  
Carney J, 2008, REG ANESTH PAIN MED, V571, P33
[10]   Ipsilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Provides Effective Analgesia After Appendectomy in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Carney, John ;
Finnerty, Olivia ;
Rauf, Jassim ;
Curley, Gerard ;
McDonnell, John G. ;
Laffey, John G. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 111 (04) :998-1003