Concentration of the Most-Cited Papers in the Scientific Literature: Analysis of Journal Ecosystems

被引:82
作者
Ioannidis, John P. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ioannina, Sch Med, Dept Hyg & Epidemiol, Clin & Mol Epidemiol Unit, GR-45110 Ioannina, Greece
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Fdn Res & Technol Hellas, Biomed Res Inst, Ioannina, Greece
来源
PLOS ONE | 2006年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0000005
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. A minority of scientific journals publishes the majority of scientific papers and receives the majority of citations. The extent of concentration of the most influential articles is less well known. Methods/Principal Findings. The 100 most-cited papers in the last decade in each of 21 scientific fields were analyzed; fields were considered as ecosystems and their "species'' (journal) diversity was evaluated. Only 9% of journals in Journal Citation Reports had published at least one such paper. Among this 9%, half of them had published only one such paper. The number of journals that had published a larger number of most-cited papers decreased exponentially according to a Lotka law. Except for three scientific fields, six journals accounted for 53 to 94 of the 100 most-cited papers in their field. With increasing average number of citations per paper (citation density) in a scientific field, concentration of the most-cited papers in a few journals became even more prominent (p < 0.001). Concentration was unrelated to the number of papers published or number of journals available in a scientific field. Multidisciplinary journals accounted for 24% of all most-cited papers, with large variability across fields. The concentration of most-cited papers in multidisciplinary journals was most prominent in fields with high citation density (correlation coefficient 0.70, p < 0.001). Multidisciplinary journals had published fewer than eight of the 100 most-cited papers in eight scientific fields (none in two fields). Journals concentrating most-cited original articles often differed from those concentrating most-cited reviews. The concentration of the most-influential papers was stronger than the already prominent concentration of papers published and citations received. Conclusions. Despite a plethora of available journals, the most influential papers are extremely concentrated in few journals, especially in fields with high citation density. Existing multidisciplinary journals publish selectively most-cited papers from fields with high citation density.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Doubling the impact: Publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Montori, VM ;
Devereaux, PJ ;
Wilczynski, NL ;
Morgan, D ;
Haynes, RB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (05) :1012-1016
[2]   Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals [J].
Callaham, M ;
Wears, RL ;
Weber, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2847-2850
[3]  
Case DO, 2000, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V51, P635, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<635::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-H
[5]   Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers [J].
García-Berthou E. ;
Alcaraz C. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4 (1)
[6]   The history and meaning of the journal impact factor [J].
Garfield, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01) :90-93
[7]  
Garfield E, 1996, SCIENTIST, V10, P13
[8]  
GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING
[9]  
GILBERT GN, 1977, SOC STUD SCI, V7, P113
[10]   An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [J].
Hirsch, JE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (46) :16569-16572