Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders Vipera berus

被引:184
作者
Madsen, T
Stille, B
Shine, R
机构
[1] UNIV SYDNEY, SCH BIOL SCI A08, SYDNEY, NSW 2006, AUSTRALIA
[2] LUND UNIV, DEPT ZOOL, S-22362 LUND, SWEDEN
关键词
inbreeding; DNA fingerprinting; effective population size; snake; Vipera berus;
D O I
10.1016/0006-3207(95)00067-4
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Although inbreeding depression is well-studied in captive animals, ifs role in natural populations remains controversial. We provide information on an isolated population of snakes (adders Vipera berus) that has been separated from neighbouring populations by the expansion of agricultural activities in southern Sweden. Total adult population size is < 40 adult individuals, and the mating system is such that a few males have disproportionate reproductive success and hence father most of the progeny each year. The isolation and small effective population size (< 15 adults) promote inbreeding. Compared to other nan-isolated Swedish populations of adders, the isolated population shows (i) a smaller litter size relative to maternal body size, (ii) a higher proportion of deformed and stillborn offspring; (iii) a lower degree of genetic heterozygosity due to fixation or near-fixation of alleles; and (iv) a higher genetic similarity among individuals (as measured by DNA fingerprinting). The incidence of inviable offspring was sharply reduced when we introduced males from other al eas into the isolated population. These results suggest that the lower reproductive output and viability of adders in the isolated population result from inbreeding depression. We also present data to falsify two alternative hypotheses: the characteristics of the isolated population are not due to environmental contaminants (metal and pesticide residue levels are low) or to poor food supply (adult adders are in good physical condition and their neonates are of the same size as in other populations).
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 118
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ANDREN C, 1982, Amphibia-Reptilia, V3, P81, DOI 10.1163/156853882X00194
[2]  
Arnold EN., 1978, FIELD GUIDE REPTILES
[3]  
BENSCH S, 1994, EVOLUTION, V48, P317, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01314.x
[4]   INBREEDING IN GREAT-TIT [J].
BULMER, MG .
HEREDITY, 1973, 30 (JUN) :313-325
[5]   DIRECTIONS IN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY [J].
CAUGHLEY, G .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 63 (02) :215-244
[6]  
CHARLESWORTH D, 1987, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V18, P237, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.001321
[7]  
EWETS L, 1983, 1684 SWED ENV PROT B
[8]   PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS - EVIDENCE FROM A VIVIPAROUS SNAKE [J].
FORD, NB ;
SEIGEL, RA .
ECOLOGY, 1989, 70 (06) :1768-1774
[9]  
Frankel O., 1981, CONSERVATION EVOLUTI
[10]  
GIBBS HL, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P1273, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02574.x