The boundaries of loss aversion

被引:411
作者
Novemsky, N [1 ]
Kahneman, D
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.42.2.119.62292
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors propose some psychological principles to describe the boundaries of loss aversion. A key idea is that exchange goods that are given up "as intended" do not exhibit loss aversion. For example, the authors propose that money given up in purchases is not generally subject to loss aversion. The results of several experiments provide preliminary support for the hypotheses. The authors find that, consistent with prospect theory, loss aversion provides a complete account of risk aversion for risks with equal probability to win or lose. The authors propose boundaries for this result and suggest further tests of the model.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 128
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences
    Bateman, I
    Munro, A
    Rhodes, B
    Starmer, C
    Sugden, R
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 479 - 505
  • [2] BATEMAN I, IN PRESS J PUBLIC EC
  • [3] MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD
    BECKER, GM
    DEGROOT, MH
    MARSCHAK, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03): : 226 - 232
  • [4] MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE
    BENARTZI, S
    THALER, RH
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) : 73 - 92
  • [5] CAMERER C, 2000, CHOICES VLAUES FRAME
  • [6] Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing
    Carmon, Z
    Wertenbroch, K
    Zeelenberg, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [7] Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers
    Carmon, Z
    Ariely, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (03) : 360 - 370
  • [8] Chapman GB, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P47, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199803)11:1<47::AID-BDM278>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-B
  • [10] Cummings R.G., 1986, VALUING ENV GOODS AS