Evaluation of image quality and dose in renal colic: comparison of different spiral-CT protocols

被引:20
作者
Rimondini, A
Mucelli, RP
De Denaro, M
Bregant, P
Dalla Palma, L
机构
[1] Univ Trieste, Osped Cattinara, Dept Radiol, I-34149 Trieste, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore, Dept Phys Med, I-34100 Trieste, Italy
关键词
renal colic; spiral CT; X-ray dose; spatial resolution;
D O I
10.1007/s003300100821
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to test different technical spiral-CT parameters to obtain optimal image quality with reduced X-ray dose. Images were acquired with a spiral-CT system Philips Tomoscan AVE1, using 250 mA, 120 kV, and 1-s rotational time. Three protocols were tested: protocol A with 5-mm thickness, pitch 1.6, slice reconstruction every 2.5 mm; protocol B with 3-mm thickness, pitch 1.6, slice reconstruction every 1.5 mm: and protocol C with 3-mm thickness, pitch 2, slice reconstruction every 1.5 mm. Two phantoms were employed to evaluate the image quality. Axial images were acquired, then sagittal and coronal images were reconstructed. Finally, the absorbed X-ray dose for each protocol was measured. Regarding image quality, 5-mm-thick images (protocol A) showed greater spatial resolution and lower noise compared with 3-mm-thick images (protocols B and C) on the axial plane; 3-mm reconstructed sagittal and coronal images (protocols B and C) showed an improved image quality compared with 5-mm reformatted images (protocol A). Concerning X-ray dose, the mean dose was: protocol A 19.6 +/- 0.8 mGy; protocol B 14.4 +/- 0.6 mGy; protocol C 12.5 +/- 1.0 mGy. Our study supports the use of thin slices (3 mm) combined with pitch of 1.6 or 2 in renal colic for X-ray dose reduction to the patient and good image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1146
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths [J].
Bell, TV ;
Fenlon, HM ;
Davison, BD ;
Ahari, HK ;
Hussain, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :363-367
[2]  
BERGMAN A, 2000, EUR RADIOL, V10, P360
[3]   Ureterolithiasis: Value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT [J].
Boridy, IC ;
Nikolaidis, P ;
Kawashima, A ;
Goldman, SM ;
Sandler, CM .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) :619-621
[4]   Ureteral calculi: Diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients [J].
Boulay, I ;
Holtz, P ;
Foley, WD ;
White, B ;
Begun, FP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1485-1490
[5]   Optimal section spacing in single-detector helical CT [J].
Brink, JA ;
Wang, G ;
McFarland, EG .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :575-578
[6]   Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic? [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Zagoria, RJ .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 17 (02) :299-303
[7]   CT diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis [J].
Chen, MYM ;
Scharling, ES ;
Zagoria, RJ ;
Bechtold, RE ;
Dixon, RL ;
Dyer, RB .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2000, 21 (01) :2-19
[8]  
Dalla Palma L, 1997, Radiol Med, V94, P143
[9]  
Dalla Palma L, 1993, Clin Radiol, V47, P333, DOI 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81449-7
[10]   Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic [J].
Dalla Palma, L ;
Pozzi-Mucelli, R ;
Stacul, F .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (01) :4-17