Bank lending to minority and low-income households and neighborhoods: Do community reinvestment agreements make a difference?

被引:29
作者
Schwartz, A [1 ]
机构
[1] New Sch Social Res, Community Dev Res Ctr, New York, NY 10011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00423.x
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
This article marks a new direction in research on the Community Development Act (CRA) by examining the outcomes of CRA agreements, comparing the mortgage and home improvement lending of banks with and without agreements. The analysis examines Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data for all the states and metropolitan areas with CRA agreements in effect and compares mortgage and lending to low-income and minority households and neighborhoods by banks with and without agreements and by banks with different types of agreements. Banks with CRA agreements appear to be more responsive than other banks to the credit needs of minority and low-income households and neighborhoods, especially when independent mortgage banks, which are not subject to the CRA, are removed from the analysis. Few significant differences, however, were found in the lending practices of banks with different types of agreements, including banks with negotiated and voluntary agreements.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 301
页数:33
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Avery R., 1997, FEDERAL RESERVE B, V83, P707
[2]  
Bradford C., 1992, REDLINING REINVESTME
[3]  
CAMPBDEN J, 1995, CHANGING PATTERNS MO
[4]  
CAMPDEN J, 1995, CHANGING PATTERNS MO
[5]  
CHRISTIANO MR, 1995, THESIS U MARYLAND CO
[6]  
Fishbein AllenJ., 1992, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V3, P601, DOI DOI 10.1080/10511482.1992.9521104
[7]  
FORD F, 1996, ANAL MORTGAGE LENDIN
[8]  
Galster G.C., 1992, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V3, P639
[9]  
Goering J., 1996, Mortgage lending, racial discrimination, and federal policy
[10]  
HOLMES SA, 1995, NY TIMES 1011, pD11