Facilitating informed decision making about breast cancer risk and genetic counseling among women calling the NCI's cancer information service

被引:51
作者
Miller, SM [1 ]
Fleisher, L
Roussi, P
Buzaglo, JS
Schnoll, R
Slater, E
Raysor, S
Popa-Mabe, M
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Psychosocial & Behav Med Dept, Fox Chase, PA USA
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, GR-54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07366290500265335
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Despite increased interest among the public in breast cancer genetic risk and genetic testing, there are limited set-vices to help women make informed decisions about genetic testing. This study, conducted with female callers (N=279) to the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS), developed and evaluated a theory-based, educational intervention designed to increase callers' understanding of the following: (a) the kinds of information required to determine inherited risk; (b) their own personal family history of cancer; and (c) the benefits and limitations of genetic testing. Callers requesting information about breast/ovarian cancer risk, risk assessment services, and genetic testing were randomized to either: (1) standard care or (2) an educational intervention. Results show that the educational intervention reduced intention to obtain genetic testing among women at average risk. and increased intention among high-risk women at 6 months. In addition, high monitors, who typically attend to and seek information, demonstrated greater increases it? knowledge and perceived risk over the 6-month interval than low monitors, who typically are distracted front information. These findings suggest that theoretically designed interventions can be effective in helping women understand their cancer risk and appropriate risk assessment options and can be implemented successfully within a service program like the CIS.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 136
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Social implications of security and crime prevention
    Andrews, CJ
    [J]. IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2004, 23 (03) : 6 - 6
  • [2] [Anonymous], ATTENTION AVOIDANCE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, Psychosocial interventions for cancer, DOI DOI 10.1037/10402-018
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1997, Oxford Textbook of Public Health
  • [5] COGNITIVE-PROCESSES MEDIATING BEHAVIORAL CHANGE
    BANDURA, A
    ADAMS, NE
    BEYER, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 35 (03) : 125 - 139
  • [6] HUMAN AGENCY IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (09) : 1175 - 1184
  • [7] Benkendorf JL, 1997, AM J MED GENET, V73, P296, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971219)73:3<296::AID-AJMG13>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-E
  • [9] Attitudes toward genetic testing in patients at risk for HNPCC/FAP and the German population
    Berth, H
    Balck, F
    Dinkel, A
    [J]. GENETIC TESTING, 2002, 6 (04): : 273 - 280
  • [10] Biesecker BB, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V93, P257, DOI 10.1002/1096-8628(20000814)93:4<257::AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO