Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial

被引:405
作者
Litiere, Saskia [2 ]
Werutsky, Gustavo [2 ]
Fentiman, Ian S. [3 ]
Rutgers, Emiel
Christiaens, Marie-Rose [4 ]
Van Limbergen, Erik [4 ]
Baaijens, Margreet H. A. [5 ]
Bogaerts, Jan [2 ]
Bartelink, Harry [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Netherlands Canc Inst, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] European Org Res & Treatment Canc EORTC, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[4] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Canc Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY; RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RADIATION; CONSERVATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; RISK; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70042-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background The EORTC 10801 trial compared breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in patients with tumours 5 cm or smaller and axillary node negative or positive disease. Compared with BCT, MRM resulted in better local control, but did not affect overall survival or time to distant metastases. We report 20-year follow-up results. Methods The EORTC 10801 trial was open for accrual between 1980 and 1986 in eight centres in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, and South Africa. 448 patients were randomised to BCT and 420 to MRM. Randomisation was done centrally, stratifying patients by institute, carcinoma stage (I or II), and menopausal status. BCT comprised of lumpectomy and complete axillary clearance, followed by breast radiotherapy and a tumour-bed boost. The primary endpoint was time to distant metastasis. This analysis was done on all eligible patients, as they were randomised. Findings After a median follow-up of 22 . 1 years (IQR 18 . 5-23 . 8), 175 patients (42%) had distant metastases in the MRM group versus 207 (46%) in the BCT group. Furthermore, 506 patients (58%) died (232 [55%] in the MRM group and 274 [61%] in the BCT group). No significant difference was observed between BCT and MRM for time to distant metastases (hazard ratio 1 . 13, 95% CI 0 . 92-1 . 38; p=0 . 23) or for time to death (1 . 11, 0 . 94-1 . 33; 0 . 23). Cumulative incidence of distant metastases at 20 years was 42 . 6% (95% CI 37 . 8-47 . 5) in the MRM group and 46 . 9% (42 . 2-51 . 6) in the BCT group. 20-year overall survival was estimated to be 44 . 5% (95% CI 39 . 3-49 . 5) in the MRM group and 39 . 1% (34 . 4-43 . 9) in the BCT group. There was no difference between the groups in time to distant metastases or overall survival by age (time to distant metastases: <50 years 1 . 09 [95% CI 0 . 79-1 . 51] vs = 50 years 1 . 16 [0 . 90-1 . 50]; overall survival <50 years 1 . 17 [0 . 86-1 . 59] vs = 50 years 1 . 10 [0 . 89-1 . 37]). Interpretation BCT, including radiotherapy, offered as standard care to patients with early breast cancer seems to be justified, since long-term follow-up in this trial showed similar survival to that after mastectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 419
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Increased Risk of Locoregional Recurrence for Women With T1-2N0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treated With Modified Radical Mastectomy Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Compared With Breast-Conserving Therapy [J].
Abdulkarim, Bassam S. ;
Cuartero, Julie ;
Hanson, John ;
Deschenes, Jean ;
Lesniak, David ;
Sabri, Siham .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (21) :2852-2858
[2]
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[3]
EARLY-STAGE YOUNG BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: IMPACT OF LOCAL TREATMENT ON SURVIVAL [J].
Bantema-Joppe, Enja J. ;
de Munck, Linda ;
Visser, Otto ;
Willemse, Pax H. B. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. ;
Siesling, Sabine ;
Maduro, John H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04) :E553-E559
[4]
Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial [J].
Bartelink, Harry ;
Horiot, Jean-Claude ;
Poortmans, Philip M. ;
Struikmans, Henk ;
Van den Bogaert, Walter ;
Fourquet, Alain ;
Jager, Jos J. ;
Hoogenraad, Willem J. ;
Oei, S. Bing ;
Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C. ;
Pierart, Marianne ;
Collette, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (22) :3259-3265
[5]
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[6]
Impact of systemic treatment on local control for patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with breast-conservation therapy [J].
Buchholz, TA ;
Tucker, SL ;
Erwin, J ;
Mathur, D ;
Strom, EA ;
McNeese, MD ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Cristofanilli, M ;
Esteva, FJ ;
Newman, L ;
Singletary, SE ;
Buzdar, AU ;
Hunt, KK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) :2240-2246
[7]
5-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING TOTAL MASTECTOMY AND SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT RADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
FISHER, B ;
BAUER, M ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
POISSON, R ;
PILCH, Y ;
REDMOND, C ;
FISHER, E ;
WOLMARK, N ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MONTAGUE, E ;
SAFFER, E ;
WICKERHAM, L ;
LERNER, H ;
GLASS, A ;
SHIBATA, H ;
DECKERS, P ;
KETCHAM, A ;
OISHI, R ;
RUSSELL, I .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (11) :665-673
[8]
Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[9]
HARMER MH, 1978, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, P47
[10]
Consensus statement on postmastectomy radiation therapy [J].
Harris, JR ;
Halpin-Murphy, P ;
McNeese, M ;
Mendenhall, NP ;
Morrow, M ;
Robert, NJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05) :989-990