A study of semen parameters with emphasis on sperm morphology in a fertile population: an attempt to develop clinical thresholds

被引:66
作者
Gunalp, S
Onculoglu, C
Gurgan, T
Kruger, TF
Lombard, CJ
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Reprod Biol Unit, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
[2] Tygerberg Hosp, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Reprod Med, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Div Androl, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[5] MRC, Natl Programme Hlth Syst & Policy, Biostat Unit, Tygerberg, South Africa
关键词
in-vivo fertilization; semen parameters; sperm morphology;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/16.1.110
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to determine the semen parameters of a proven fertile population and to compare these parameters with that of a subfertile group in the same region, Sixty-nine fertile male patients were studied and compared with 93 patients recruited at an infertility clinic. A sub-sample of patients was matched according to age. Sixty-one were studied in the fertile group and 62 in the infertile group. Receiver operator characteristics analysis was done on the sub-sample. The threshold value of the progressive motility was 42% and it was the best parameter with sperm morphology to distinguish between the two groups, At 69% sensitivity and 67% specificity the sperm morphology threshold was 12% normal forms. If the positive and negative predictive value was used to screen the general population to identify the subfertile group, a 5% normal morphology threshold was indicated with 14% progressive motility, 30% motility and a concentration of 9x10(6)/ml or lower. The negative predictive values of the parameters were good and achieved 90% in most cases, The sensitivity of the semen parameters at the reported thresholds was poor and indicated a large overlap in the distributions of these variables in the fertile and infertile groups. To distinguish between the fertile and subfertile population, the most significant finding of this study was the progressive motility with a threshold level of 14%. The cut-off value of the sperm morphology (5%) in vivo was consistent with the previous publications in assisted reproduction programmes for sperm morphology.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   CLINICAL-VALUE OF SPERM MORPHOLOGY FOR IN-VIVO FERTILITY - COMPARISON BETWEEN WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION CRITERIA OF 1987 AND 1992 [J].
BARRATT, CLR ;
NAEENI, M ;
CLEMENTS, S ;
COOKE, ID .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (03) :587-593
[2]   What constitutes a normal seminal analysis? Semen parameters of 243 fertile men [J].
Chia, SE ;
Tay, SK ;
Lim, ST .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (12) :3394-3398
[3]   Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review [J].
Coetzee, K ;
Kruge, TF ;
Lombard, CJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 1998, 4 (01) :73-82
[4]   Clinical value of using an automated sperm morphology analyzer (IVOS) [J].
Coetzee, K ;
de Villiers, A ;
Kruger, TF ;
Lombard, CJ .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (02) :222-225
[5]  
Eliasson R, 1971, ANDROLOGIE, V3, P49, DOI [10.1111/j.1439-0272.1971.tb01125.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1439-0272.1971.TB01125.X]
[6]  
FISHER LD, 1993, BIOSTATISTIC METHODO, P207
[7]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843
[8]  
KRUGER TF, 1986, FERTIL STERIL, V46, P1118
[9]   Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination [J].
Lindheim, SR ;
Barad, DH ;
Zinger, M ;
Witt, B ;
Amin, H ;
Cohen, B ;
Fisch, H ;
Barg, P .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1996, 13 (07) :569-572
[10]  
MACLEOD J, 1962, FERTIL STERIL, V13, P29