Response of anterior parietal cortex to different modes of same-site skin stimulation

Intrinsic optical signal (IOS) imaging was used to study responses of the anterior parietal cortical hindlimb region (1 subject) and forelimb region (3 subjects) to repetitive skin stimulation. Subjects were four squirrel monkeys anesthetized with a halothane/nitrous oxide/oxygen gas mixtures. Cutaneous flutter of 25 Hz evoked a reflectance decrease in the sectors of cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and/or 1 that receive input from the stimulated skin site. The intrinsic signal evoked by 25-Hz flutter attained maximal intensity less than or equal to 2.5-3.5 s after stimulus onset, remained well maintained as long as stimulation was continued, and disappeared rapidly (usually less than or equal to 2-5 s) after stimulus termination. Repetitive skin heating stimuli were delivered via a probe/thermode in stationary contact with the skin (6 temperature ramps/trial; within-trial ramp frequency 0.42 Hz; intertrial interval 180 s; initial temperature 32-36 degrees C; maximal temperature 48-52 degrees C; rate of temperature change 19 degrees C/s). Skin heating led to a large-amplitude reflectance decrease within a zone of area 3a, which neighbored the region in areas 3b/l that emitted an intrinsic signal in response to same-site 25-Hz flutter in the same subject. In three of four subjects a lower-amplitude decrease in reflectance also occurred in a region of area 4 continuous with the area 3a region that responded maximally to same-site skin heating. The reflectance decrease evoked in areas 3a/4 by skin heating consistently exceeded in both intensity and spatial extent the decrease in reflectance evoked in areas 3b/l by same-site 25-Hz cutaneous Butter. These findings are viewed as consistent with the proposal that area 3a plays a leading role in the anterior parietal cortical processing of the afferent drive evoked by skin-heating stimuli perceived as painful. In all four subjects the reflectance decrease evoked in areas 3a/4 by skin heating was accompanied by a simultaneous but opposite change in reflectance (a reflectance increase) within a large territory located immediately posterior to the regions that responded with a decrease in reflectance-an observation that raised the possibility that skin heating evoked opposing influences on the activity of area 3a and 3b/l regions that receive input from the stimulated skin site. This was evaluated with the method of correlation mapping. The observations obtained with correlation mapping appear consistent with demonstrations by others that skin-heating stimuli perceived as painful by conscious subjects suppress/inhibit the anterior parietal response to innocuous mechanical skin stimulation. The opposing (relative to the response of area 3a) optical response of area 1 and/or area 3b during skin heating stimulation is attributed to suppression/inhibition of area 1 and/or area 3b neuron activity.