Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in head-injured patients - A validation study

被引:131
作者
Steiner, LA
Coles, JP
Johnston, AJ
Chatfield, DA
Smielewski, P
Fryer, TD
Aigbirhio, FI
Clark, JC
Pickard, JD
Menon, DK
Czosnyka, M
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Wolfson Brain Imaging Ctr, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Univ Dept Anaesthesia, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
autoregulation; brain injuries; monitoring; physiologic; tomography; emission computed;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000089014.59668.04
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose - Cerebrovascular autoregulation is frequently measured in head-injured patients. We attempted to validate 4 bedside methods used for assessment of autoregulation. Methods - PET was performed at a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) of 70 and 90 mm Hg in 20 patients. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for oxygen (CMRO2) were determined at each CPP level. Patients were sedated with propofol and fentanyl. Norepinephrine was used to control CPP. During PET scanning, transcranial Doppler (TCD) flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was monitored, and the arterio-jugular oxygen content difference (AJDO(2)) was measured at each CPP. Autoregulation was determined as the static rate of autoregulation based on PET (SRORPET) and TCD (SRORTCD) data, based on changes in AJDO(2), and with 2 indexes based on the relationship between slow waves of CPP and flow velocity ( mean velocity index, Mx) and between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure ( pressure reactivity index, PRx) Results - We found significant correlations between SRORPET and SRORTCD (r(2) = 0.32; P < 0.01) and between SRORPET and PRx (r(2) = 0.31; P < 0.05). There were no significant associations between PET data and autoregulation as assessed by changes in AJDO(2). Global CMRO2 was significantly lower at the higher CPP (P < 0.01). Conclusions - Despite some variability, SRORTCD and PRx may provide useful approximations of autoregulation in head-injured patients. At least with our methods, CMRO2 changes with the increase in CPP; hence, flow-metabolism coupling may affect the results of autoregulation testing.
引用
收藏
页码:2404 / 2409
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] CEREBRAL AUTO-REGULATION DYNAMICS IN HUMANS
    AASLID, R
    LINDEGAARD, KF
    SORTEBERG, W
    NORNES, H
    [J]. STROKE, 1989, 20 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [2] Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) : 135 - 160
  • [3] COLEMAN MR, 2002, J NEUROSURG ANESTHES, V14, P91
  • [4] COMPUTER-SUPPORTED MULTIMODAL BED-SIDE MONITORING FOR NEURO INTENSIVE-CARE
    CZOSNYKA, M
    WHITEHOUSE, H
    SMIELEWSKI, P
    KIRKPATRICK, P
    GUAZZO, EP
    PICKARD, JD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1994, 11 (04): : 223 - 232
  • [5] Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation in head-injured patients
    Czosnyka, M
    Smielewski, P
    Kirkpatrick, P
    Menon, DK
    Pickard, JD
    [J]. STROKE, 1996, 27 (10) : 1829 - 1834
  • [6] Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury
    Czosnyka, M
    Smielewski, P
    Kirkpatrick, P
    Laing, RJ
    Menon, D
    Pickard, JD
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 41 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [7] Czosnyka M, 1998, ACT NEUR S, V71, P74
  • [8] Cerebral autoregulation following head injury
    Czosnyka, M
    Smielewski, P
    Piechnik, S
    Steiner, LA
    Pickard, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 95 (05) : 756 - 763
  • [9] Dynamic autoregulatory response after severe head injury
    Hlatky, R
    Furuya, Y
    Valadka, AB
    Gonzalez, J
    Chacko, A
    Mizutani, Y
    Contant, CF
    Robertson, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (05) : 1054 - 1061
  • [10] Cerebral autoregulation following minor head injury
    Junger, EC
    Newell, DW
    Grant, GA
    Avellino, AM
    Ghatan, S
    Douville, CM
    Lam, AM
    Aaslid, R
    Winn, HR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1997, 86 (03) : 425 - 432