Cost of resistance and tolerance under competition:: the defense-stress benefit hypothesis

被引:64
作者
Siemens, DH
Lischke, H
Maggiulli, N
Schürch, S
Roy, BA
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, ETH, Geobot Inst, CH-8044 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[3] Univ Oregon, Ctr Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Biol Dept 5289, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Arabis drummondii; Arabis perennans; Bouteloua gracilis; competition; costs; Plutella xylostella; resistance; stress; tolerance;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025517229934
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Defense costs provide a major explanation for why plants in nature have not evolved to be better defended against pathogens and herbivores; however, evidence for defense costs is often lacking. Plants defend by deploying resistance traits that reduce damage, and tolerance traits that reduce the fitness effects of damage. We first tested the defense-stress cost (DSC) hypothesis that costs of defenses increase and become important under competitive stress. In a greenhouse experiment, uniparental maternal families of the host plant Arabis perennans were grown in the presence and absence of the bunch grass Bouteloua gracilis and the herbivore Plutella xylostella. Costs of resistance and tolerance manifest as reduced growth in the absence of herbivory were significant when A. perennans grew alone, but not in the competitive environment, in contrast to the DSC hypothesis. We then tested the defense-stress benefit (DSB) hypothesis that plant defenses may benefit plants in competitive situations thereby reducing net costs. For example, chemical resistance agents and tolerance may also have functions in competitive interactions. To test the DSB hypothesis, we compared differentially competitive populations for defense costs, assuming that poorer competitors from less dense habitats were less likely to have evolved defenses that also function in competition. Without competitive benefits of defenses, poorer competitors were expected to have higher net costs of defenses under competition in accordance with DSB. Populations of A. perennans and A. drummondii that differed dramatically in competitiveness were compared for costs, and as the DSB hypothesis predicts, only the poor competitor population showed costs of resistance under competition. However, cost of tolerance under competition did not differ among populations, suggesting that the poor competitors might have evolved a general stress tolerance. Although the DSC hypothesis may explain cases where defense costs increase under stress, the DSB hypothesis may explain some cases where costs decrease under competitive stress.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 263
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   The balance of terror: An alternative mechanism for competitive trade-offs and its implications for invading species [J].
Adler, FR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 154 (05) :497-509
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PLANT RESOURCE ALLOC
[3]  
Augner M, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P2369, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2369:EODOCI]2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Jasmonate-induced responses of Nicotiana sylvestris results in fitness costs due to impaired competitive ability for nitrogen [J].
Baldwin, IT ;
Hamilton, W .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2000, 26 (04) :915-952
[6]   HERBIVORY SIMULATIONS IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH [J].
BALDWIN, IT .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1990, 5 (03) :91-93
[7]  
Berenbaum May R., 1999, P10
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF GENOTYPE AND THE ENVIRONMENT ON COSTS OF RESISTANCE IN LETTUCE [J].
BERGELSON, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 143 (02) :349-359
[9]   Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants [J].
Bergelson, J ;
Purrington, CB .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 148 (03) :536-558
[10]   CHANGES IN FECUNDITY DO NOT PREDICT INVASIVENESS - A MODEL STUDY OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS [J].
BERGELSON, J .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (01) :249-252