Validation of the EuroSCORE risk models in Turkish adult cardiac surgical population

被引:28
作者
Akar, Ahmet Ruchan [1 ]
Kurtcephe, Murat [2 ]
Sener, Erol [3 ]
Alhan, Cem [4 ]
Durdu, Serkan
Kunt, Ayse Gul [3 ]
Guvenir, Halil Altay [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ctr Heart, TR-06340 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Bilkent Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Ataturk Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Acibadem Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Cardiac surgery; Risk prediction model; Mortality; EuroSCORE; TurkoSCORE; BYPASS-GRAFTING SURGERY; PREDICT OPERATIVE RISK; EUROPEAN SYSTEM; LOGISTIC EUROSCORE; SOCIETY; PERFORMANCE; MORTALITY; DATABASE; WELL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to validate additive and logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) models on Turkish adult cardiac surgical population. Methods: TurkoSCORE project involves a reliable web-based database to build up Turkish risk stratification models. Current patient population consisted of 9443 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2005 and 2010. However, the additive and logistic EuroSCORE models were applied to only 8018 patients whose EuroSCORE determinants were complete. Observed and predicted mortalities were compared for low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. Results: The mean patient age was 59.5 years (+/- 12.1 years) at the time of surgery, and 28.6% were female. There were significant differences (all p < 0.001) in the prevalence of recent myocardial infarction (23.5% vs 9.7%), moderate left ventricular function (29.9% vs 25.6%), unstable angina (9.8% vs 8.0%), chronic pulmonary disease (13.4% vs 3.9%), active endocarditis (3.2% vs 1.1%), critical preoperative state (9.0% vs 4.1%), surgery on thoracic aorta (3.7% vs 2.4%), extracardiac arteriopathy (8.6% vs 11.3%), previous cardiac surgery (4.1% vs 7.3%), and other than isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG; 23.0% vs 36.4%) between Turkish and European cardiac surgical populations, respectively. For the entire cohort, actual hospital mortality was 1.96% (n = 157; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.70-2.32). However, additive predicted mortality was 2.98% (p < 0.001 vs observed; 95% CI, 2.90-3.00), and logistic predicted mortality was 3.17% (p < 0.001 vs observed; 95% CI, 3.03-3.21). The predictive performance of EuroSCORE models for the entire cohort was fair with 0.757 (95% CI, 0.717-0.797) AUC value (area under the receiver operating characteristic, AUC) for additive EuroSCORE, and 0.760 (95% CI, 0.721-0.800) AUC value for logistic EuroSCORE. Observed hospital mortality for isolated CABG was 1.23% (n = 75; 95% CI, 0.95-1.51) while additive and logistic predicted mortalities were 2.87% (95% CI, 2.82-2.93) and 2.89% (95% CI, 2.80-2.98), respectively. AUC values for the isolated CABG subset were 0.768 (95% CI, 0.707-0.830) and 0.766 (95% CI, 0.705-0.828) for additive and logistic EuroSCORE models. Conclusion: The original EuroSCORE risk models overestimated mortality at all risk subgroups in Turkish population. Remodeling strategies for EuroSCORE or creation of a new model is warranted for future studies in Turkey. (C) 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 735
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk? [J].
Bhatti, F. ;
Grayson, A. D. ;
Grotte, G. ;
Fabri, B. M. ;
Au, J. ;
Jones, M. ;
Bridgewater, B. .
HEART, 2006, 92 (12) :1817-1820
[2]
Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction [J].
Cook, Nancy R. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (07) :928-935
[3]
Comparison between an empirically derived model and the EuroSCORE system in the evaluation of hospital performance: the example of the Italian CABG outcome project [J].
D'Errigo, Paola ;
Seccareccia, Fulvia ;
Rosato, Stefano ;
Manno, Valerio ;
Badoni, Gabriella ;
Fusco, Danilo ;
Perucci, Carlo A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 33 (03) :325-333
[4]
EuroSCORE: a systematic review of international performance [J].
Gogbashian, A ;
Sedrakyan, A ;
Treasure, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 25 (05) :695-700
[5]
Guvenir HA, 1996, MACH LEARN, V23, P47
[6]
Hariharan Seetharaman, 2006, Curr Surg, V63, P226
[7]
EuroSCORE overestimates the cardiac operative risk [J].
Karabulut, H ;
Toraman, F ;
Alhan, C ;
Çamur, G ;
Evrenkaya, S ;
Dagdelen, S ;
Tarcan, S .
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 11 (04) :295-298
[8]
Risk stratification analysis of operative mortality in heart and thoracic aorta surgery: comparison between Parsonnet and EuroSCORE additive model [J].
Kawachi, Y ;
Nakashima, A ;
Toshima, Y ;
Arinaga, K ;
Kawano, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 20 (05) :961-966
[9]
Logistic or additive EuroSCORE for high-risk patients? [J].
Michel, P ;
Roques, F ;
Nashef, SAM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 23 (05) :684-687
[10]
Coronary surgery in Europe: comparison of the national subsets of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation database [J].
Nashef, SAM ;
Rogues, F ;
Michel, P ;
Cortina, J ;
Faichney, A ;
Gams, E ;
Harjula, A ;
Jones, MT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 17 (04) :396-398