Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions

被引:926
作者
Dietz, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Gardner, Gerald T. [4 ]
Gilligan, Jonathan [5 ]
Stern, Paul C. [1 ]
Vandenbergh, Michael P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Div Behav & Social Sci & Educ, Washington, DC 20001 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Sociol & Environm Sci, E Lansing, MI 48864 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Policy Program, E Lansing, MI 48864 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Behav Sci, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Climate Change Res Network, Sch Law, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
climate mitigation; climate policy; energy efficiency; household behavior; energy consumption; ENERGY; COMMUNICATION; INCENTIVES; FEEDBACK; POLICY;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0908738106
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Most climate change policy attention has been addressed to long-term options, such as inducing new, low-carbon energy technologies and creating cap-and-trade regimes for emissions. We use a behavioral approach to examine the reasonably achievable potential for near-term reductions by altered adoption and use of available technologies in US homes and nonbusiness travel. We estimate the plasticity of 17 household action types in 5 behaviorally distinct categories by use of data on the most effective documented interventions that do not involve new regulatory measures. These interventions vary by type of action and typically combine several policy tools and strong social marketing. National implementation could save an estimated 123 million metric tons of carbon per year in year 10, which is 20% of household direct emissions or 7.4% of US national emissions, with little or no reduction in household well-being. The potential of household action deserves increased policy attention. Future analyses of this potential should incorporate behavioral as well as economic and engineering elements.
引用
收藏
页码:18452 / 18456
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation
    Abrahamse, W
    Steg, L
    Vlek, C
    Rothengatter, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) : 273 - 291
  • [2] The effectiveness of mass communication to change public Behavior
    Abroms, Lorien C.
    Maibach, Edward W.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 29 : 219 - +
  • [3] [Anonymous], INT EN ANN 2006
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Environmental problems and human behavior
  • [5] [Anonymous], CARB BUDG TRENDS 200
  • [6] [Anonymous], LIQ TRANSP FUELS COA
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1999, Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing
  • [8] BROWN MA, 2008, PUBL OAK RIDGE NATL
  • [9] Clayton S., 2009, CONSERVATION PSYCHOL
  • [10] The struggle to govern the commons
    Dietz, T
    Ostrom, E
    Stern, PC
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5652) : 1907 - 1912