Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production

被引:628
作者
Acar, Canan [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Naterer, Greg F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, 240 Prince Phillip Dr, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
hydrogen; solar; photocatalyst; quantum yield; band gap; LIGHT-DRIVEN PHOTOCATALYST; VISIBLE-LIGHT; TIO2; NANOPARTICLES; H-2; EVOLUTION; MIXED-OXIDE; PRODUCTION OPTIONS; METHYL-ORANGE; SOLAR-ENERGY; EFFICIENT; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1002/er.3549
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
080707 [能源环境工程]; 082001 [油气井工程];
摘要
This paper examines photocatalytic hydrogen production as a clean energy solution to address challenges of climate change and environmental sustainability. Advantages and disadvantages of various hydrogen production methods, with a particular emphasis on photocatalytic hydrogen production, are discussed in this paper. Social, environmental and economic aspects are taken into account while assessing selected production methods and types of photocatalysts. In the first part of this paper, various hydrogen production options are introduced and comparatively assessed. Then, solar-based hydrogen production options are examined in a more detailed manner along with a comparative performance assessment. Next, photocatalytic hydrogen production options are introduced, photocatalysis mechanisms and principles are discussed and the main groups of photocatalysts, namely titanium oxide, cadmium sulfide, zinc oxide/sulfide and other metal oxidebased photocatalyst groups, are introduced. After discussing recycling issues of photocatalysts, a comparative performance assessment is conducted based on hydrogen production processes (both per mass and surface area of photocatalysts), band gaps and quantum yields. The results show that among individual photocatalysts, on average, Au-CdS has the best performance when band gap, quantum yield and hydrogen production rates are considered. From this perspective, TiO2-ZnO has the poorest performance. Among the photocatalyst groups, cadmium sulfides have the best average performance, while other metal oxides show the poorest rankings, on average. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1449 / 1473
页数:25
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]
Abanades A., 2012, Agronomy Research, V10, P11
[2]
A review on selected heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Zamfirescu, Calin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (15) :1903-1920
[3]
Analysis and assessment of a continuous-type hybrid photoelectrochemical system for hydrogen production [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (28) :15362-15372
[4]
Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources [J].
Acar, Canan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) :1-12
[5]
Solar thermal reforming of methane feedstocks for hydrogen and syngas production-A review [J].
Agrafiotis, Christos ;
von Storch, Henrik ;
Roeb, Martin ;
Sattler, Christian .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :656-682
[6]
Nano-WO3-supported sulfonic acid: New, efficient and high reusable heterogeneous nano catalyst [J].
Amoozadeh, Ali ;
Rahmani, Salman .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL, 2015, 396 :96-107
[7]
Delayed Photoelectron Transfer in Pt-Decorated CdS Nanorods under Hydrogen Generation Conditions [J].
Berr, Maximilian J. ;
Vaneski, Aleksandar ;
Mauser, Christian ;
Fischbach, Stefan ;
Susha, Andrei S. ;
Rogach, Andrey L. ;
Jaeckel, Frank ;
Feldmann, Jochen .
SMALL, 2012, 8 (02) :291-297
[8]
Facet Effect of Single-Crystalline Ag3PO4 Sub-microcrystals on Photocatalytic Properties [J].
Bi, Yingpu ;
Ouyang, Shuxin ;
Umezawa, Naoto ;
Cao, Junyu ;
Ye, Jinhua .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 133 (17) :6490-6492
[9]
Bullard C.W., 1978, RESOUR ENERG, V1, P267, DOI 10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7
[10]
Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods [J].
Cetinkaya, E. ;
Dincer, I. ;
Naterer, G. F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (03) :2071-2080