Characterization of 5-HT1A receptor functional coupling in cells expressing the human 5-HT1A receptor as assessed with the cytosensor microphysiometer

The functional activity of a series of 5-HT1A receptor ligands has been evaluated in a cell line expressing the human 5-HT1A receptor (h5-HT1A. CHO) using the agonist-stimulated increase in extracellular acidification rate, measured with the microphysiometer, as a functional assay. Both 5-CT and 8-OH-DPAT were potent agonists in stimulating an increase in extracellular acidification rate in h5-HT1A. CHO cells with estimated EC50 values of 1.2 and 7.8 nM, respectively. Additionally, these two 5-HT1A receptor agonists elicited a similar maximum response. Concentration-dependent agonist activity was also observed in the presence of buspirone, ipsapirone, BMY7378, NAN-190 and WAY100135, and each of these compounds behaved as partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists. The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 produced a potent (IC50, 2.3 nM) and complete block of the 8-OH-DPAT-stimulated response. An evaluation of the inhibitory activity of a series of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists produced the following rank order of potency; WAY100635 > LY206130 (IC50, 7.1 nM) > WAY100135 (30.8 nM) > pindolol(76.2 nM) > (-)UH-301 (92.8 nM). Parallel studies on the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in h5-HT1A. CHO cells revealed that agonist potencies were generally similar between the two functional assays and were in good agreement with the estimated 5-HT1A receptor binding affinities. However, the relative efficacies determined for the partial agonists in the cAMP assay were substantially greater than those observed with the microphysiometer. Finally, antagonists were considerably weaker in the cAMP assay compared with the microphysiometer. The evaluation of 5-HT1A ligands using the microphysiometer, which represents a very distinct indice of 5-HT1A receptor function compared with the cAMP assay, results in a different profile of functional activity. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.