Survey of undergraduate pain curricula for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom

被引:148
作者
Briggs, Emma V. [1 ]
Carr, Eloise C. J. [2 ]
Whittaker, Maggie S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Sch Nursing & Midwifery, London SE1 8WA, England
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Bournemouth, Dorset, England
[3] Univ Essex, Sch Hlth & Human Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Pain education; Undergraduate curricula; Survey; Interprofessional learning; NURSING-STUDENTS KNOWLEDGE; INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION; ATTITUDES; MANAGEMENT; FACULTIES; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
The prevalence and burden of pain has long been reported as problematic. Comprehensive pain education in undergraduate programmes is essential for developing knowledgeable, skilled and effective healthcare professionals. This cross-sectional survey describes the nature, content and learning strategies for pain curricula in undergraduate healthcare programmes in major universities in the United Kingdom (UK). Document analysis also highlighted gaps in pain-related standards from professional regulators and a higher education quality assurance body. The sample consisted of 19 higher education institutions delivering 108 programmes across dentistry, medicine, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy and veterinary science. Seventy-four (68.5%) questionnaires were returned averaging 12.0 h of pain content with physiotherapy and veterinary science students receiving the highest input. Pain education accounted for less than 1% of programme hours for some disciplines. Traditional teaching methods dominated (e. g. lectures 87.8%) and only two programmes had fully implemented the International Association for the Study of Pain's (IASP) curricula. Minimal pain-related standards were found from professional regulators and the quality assurance documents. Pain education is variable across and within disciplines and interprofessional learning is minimal. Published curricula for pain education have been available for over 20 years but are rarely employed and pain is not a core part of regulatory and quality assurance standards for health professions. The hours of pain education is woefully inadequate given the prevalence and burden of pain. Recommendations include the introduction of pain-related educational standards across all professions, greater integration of pain content in undergraduate programmes and interprofessional approaches to the topic. (C) 2011 European Federation of International Association for the Study of Pain Chapters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 795
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]
A comparison of the knowledge of chronic pain and its management between final year physiotherapy and medical students [J].
Ali, Nada ;
Thomson, D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 13 (01) :38-50
[2]
*AM AC PAIN MED UN, 2000, PAIN MED, V1, P224
[3]
[Anonymous], 2000, The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform
[4]
[Anonymous], 2002, DEF IPE
[5]
[Anonymous], 2009, STAND ED TRAIN
[6]
Barrett Gillian, 2003, J Interprof Care, V17, P293, DOI 10.1080/1356182031000122915
[7]
Cavanagh S, 1997, Nurse Res, V4, P5, DOI 10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
[8]
Charlton J., 2005, CORE CURRICULUM PROF
[9]
*CHART SOC PHYS, 2002, CHART SOC PHYS CURR
[10]
Student nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy of children's pain management: Evaluation of an education program in Taiwan [J].
Chiang, Li-Chi ;
Chen, Hsiu-Jung ;
Huang, Lichi .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (01) :82-89