Using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to understand the decision to use condoms in an STD clinic population

被引:30
作者
Becker, SA
Morrison, DM
Carter, WB
Verdon, MS
机构
[1] AMGEN INC,PHARMACEUT CLIN GRANTS,THOUSAND OAKS,CA
[2] HARBORVIEW SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DIS CLIN,SEATTLE,WA
来源
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY | 1996年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109019819602300411
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The theory of reasoned action (TRA) provides useful information when designing health education interventions. In this study, 703 heterosexual STD clinic clients responded to a TRA-based survey. With steady partners, social norms and attitudes toward condom use were significant predictors of intention for both men and women. The interaction of attitude and norm increased prediction for men (R = .64, p < 0.001) and women (R = .70, p < 0.001). With casual partners, attitude was a predictor for men and social norm was a predictor for women. Prior use of condoms increased prediction for men (R = .38, p < 0.001) and women (R = .47, p < 0.001). Findings suggest that, in addition to traditional TRA model variables, the relationship between sexual partners and the individual's prior experience with condom use should be incorporated into attempts to understand this complex, dyadic behavior. Examining specific outcome and normative beliefs also provides important information for intervention design.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 542
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ADLER NE, 1987, ANN M AM PSYCH ASS N
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, SOCIAL FDN ACTION SO
[3]  
Aral S. O., 1990, SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED, P19
[4]   SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED DISEASES IN THE AIDS ERA [J].
ARAL, SO ;
HOLMES, KK .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1991, 264 (02) :62-69
[5]   AN EXAMINATION OF THE VALIDITY OF 2 MODELS OF ATTITUDE [J].
BAGOZZI, RP .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1981, 16 (03) :323-359
[7]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[8]   HUMAN AGENCY IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1989, 44 (09) :1175-1184
[9]  
BANDURA A, 1990, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V19, P9
[10]  
BENTLER PM, 1979, PSYCHOL REV, V86, P452