Developing a multicriteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance

被引:70
作者
Ding, GKC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Fac Design Archiecture & Bldg, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
cost-benefit analysis (CBA); decision support system; environmental assessment; project appraisal; project assessment; sustainability index; sustainable development;
D O I
10.1080/0961321042000322618
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In Australia, cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is one of the conventional tools used widely by the public and the private sectors in the appraisal of projects. It measures and compares the total costs and benefits of projects that are competing for scarce resources in monetary terms. Growing concerns that the values of environmental goods and services are often ignored or underestimated in the CBA approach have led to the overuse and depletion of environmental assets. A model of a sustainability index as an evaluation tool that combines economic. social and environmental criteria into an indexing algorithm is presented and described. The sustainability index uses monetary and non-monetary approaches to rank projects and facilities on their contribution to sustainability. This process enables the principle of trade-off to occur in the decision-making process and thereby allows environmental values to be considered when selecting a development option. This makes it possible to optimize financial return. maximize resource consumption and minimize detrimental effects to the natural and man-made world. A case study is used to demonstrate the model.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 16
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENV RESOUR EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, P COBRA 1999 RICS RE
[3]  
Azqueta D., 1992, Development Policy Review, V10, P255, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7679.1992.tb00015.x
[4]   Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the construction industry green? [J].
Ball, J .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 37 (04) :421-428
[5]  
Barbier Edward, 2003, Australian Economic Papers, V42, P253, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8454.00198
[6]   A vision and methodology for integrated sustainable urban development: BEQUEST [J].
Bentivegna, V ;
Curwell, S ;
Deakin, M ;
Lombardi, P ;
Mitchell, G ;
Nijkamp, P .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2002, 30 (02) :83-94
[7]   Building environmental assessment methods: clarifying intentions [J].
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1999, 27 (4-5) :230-246
[8]   The Green Building Challenge in the UK [J].
Curwell, S ;
Yates, A ;
Howard, N ;
Bordass, B ;
Doggart, J .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 1999, 27 (4-5) :286-293
[9]   VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES - A CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH [J].
GREGORY, R ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1993, 7 (02) :177-197
[10]  
Hill R., 1997, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V15, P223, DOI DOI 10.1080/014461997372971