How Drug Enforcement Affects Drug Prices

被引:85
作者
Caulkins, Jonathan P. [1 ,2 ]
Reuter, Peter [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heinz Coll, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Publ Policy, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Criminol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
CRIME AND JUSTICE: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH, VOL 39 | 2010年 / 39卷
关键词
ILLICIT DRUG; LAW-ENFORCEMENT; HEROIN; IMPACT; METHAMPHETAMINE; COCAINE; REDUCTION; MARIJUANA; MARKETS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1086/652386
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Enforcement against drug selling remains the principal tool of drug control in the United States and many other countries. Though the risk of incarceration for a drug dealer has risen fivefold or more over the last 25 years in the United States, the prices of cocaine and heroin have fallen substantially. Different models of how enforcement affects drug supply may help explain the paradox. There are substantial periods in which drug markets are not in the stable equilibrium that has informed much of the empirical research. Enforcement is likely to be more effective in preventing the formation of a mass market than in suppressing such a market once it has formed. Once a mass market is established, there may be little return to intense enforcement. A modest level of enforcement may generate most of the benefits from prohibition.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 271
页数:59
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J DRUG POLICY ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSING CRAC UNPUB
[3]  
[Anonymous], NIH PUBLICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, STREET LEVEL DRUG EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference
[7]  
[Anonymous], CRIM US 2008
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it
[9]  
ARKES J, 2004, 2007769 NCJ RAND OFF
[10]  
Babor T., 2010, Drug policy and the public good