Impact of nitrogen management practices on nutritional status and yield of Valencia orange trees and groundwater nitrate

被引:44
作者
Alva, AK
Paramasivam, S
Graham, WD
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Ctr Citrus Res & Educ, Lake Alfred, FL 33850 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Inst Food & Agr Sci, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700040026x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A field experiment was conducted using 36-yr-old Valencia orange trees (Citrus sinensis) planted in an Astatula fine sand (hyperthermic, uncoated, Typic Quartzipsamments) to evaluate the effects of two different N management practices on the mineral nutrition status of the trees, fruit yield and quality, and nitrate (NO;) loading into groundwater, The N treatments included 180 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) as either (i) three broadcast applications per year of a combination of dry soluble form (DSF; 135 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1)) and controlled-release form (CRF; 45 kg ha(-1) yr(-1)); or (ii) fertigation in 18 equally divided applications per year. Nitrate-N was measured in groundwater sampled at 3-wk intervals using four monitoring wells in each of the two blocks over 2 yr. Fruit yield was greater by 2.7 to 8.2 Mg ha(-1) in the fertigation compared to that in the DSF/CRF broadcast treatment. Leaf nutrient concentrations or fruit quality parameters were not significantly influenced by the different N management treatments, Most of the leaf nutrients were within the recommended optimal ranges. Mean groundwater NO3-N concentrations for the DSF/CRF treatment ranged from 6.5 to 16.5, and 9.4 to 14.1 mg L-1 during 1995 and 1996, respectively. The corresponding values for the fertigation treatment ranged from 7.0 to 14.6 and 1.4 to 6.9 mg L-1. Fertigation with 18 applications per year decreased NO3-N loading into groundwater as compared to three broadcast applications of the same rate of N using DSF/CRF granular blend.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 910
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ALVA AK, 1998, IN PRESS SOIL SCI SO
[2]  
Boman BJ, 1996, FERT RES, V44, P123, DOI 10.1007/BF00750801
[3]  
BOMAN BJ, 1995, DAHL GREID INT S FER
[4]  
CARLISLE VW, 1989, 891 U FLOR I FOOD AG
[5]   FERTIGATION VERSUS BROADCASTING IN AN ORANGE GROVE [J].
DASBERG, S ;
BARAKIVA, A ;
SPAZISKY, S ;
COHEN, A .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :147-154
[6]  
Jones G. W., 1990, GROUNDWATER QUALITY
[7]   Transformation of urea and ammonium nitrate in an entisol and a spodosol under citrus production [J].
Khakural, BR ;
Alva, AK .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1996, 27 (18-20) :3045-3057
[8]   HYDROLYSIS OF UREA IN 2 SANDY SOILS UNDER CITRUS PRODUCTION AS INFLUENCED BY RATE AND DEPTH OF PLACEMENT [J].
KHAKURAL, BR ;
ALVA, AK .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1995, 26 (13-14) :2143-2156
[9]  
KOO RCJ, 1984, J FERT ISSUES, V1, P75
[10]  
OBREZA TA, 1992, 115 SL FLOR COOP EXT