Additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin to decrease risks of cardiovascular disease - Randomized and observational comparisons of secondary prevention trials and their meta-analyses

被引:75
作者
Hennekens, CH
Sacks, FM
Tonkin, A
Jukema, JW
Byington, RP
Pitt, B
Berry, DA
Berry, SM
Ford, NF
Walker, AJ
Natarajan, K
Sheng-Lin, C
Fiedorek, FT
Belder, R
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Mt Sinai Med Ctr,Miami Heart Inst, Dept Med & Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Boca Raton, FL 33432 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Natl Heart Fdn Australia, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Berry Associates, Houston, TX USA
[9] Woodfield Clin Consulting LLC, Lawrenceville, NJ USA
[10] Bristol Myers Squibb Co, New York, NY 10154 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.164.1.40
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In randomized trials of secondary prevention, pravastatin sodium and aspirin reduce risks of cardiovascular disease. Pravastatin has a predominantly delayed antiatherogenic effect, and aspirin has an immediate antiplatelet effect, raising the possibility of additive clinical benefits. Methods: In 5 randomized trials of secondary prevention with pravastatin (40 mg/d), comprising 73 900 patient-years of observation, aspirin use was also prescribed in varying frequencies, and data were available on a large number of confounding variables. We tested whether pravastatin and aspirin have additive benefits in the 2 large trials (Longterm Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease trial and the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events trial) that were designed to test clinical benefits. We also performed meta-analyses of these 2 trials and 3 smaller angiographic trials that collected clinical end points. In all analyses, multivariate models were used to adjust for a large number of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Results: Individual trials and all meta-analyses demonstrated similar additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin on cardiovascular disease. In meta-analysis, the relative risk reductions for fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction were 31% for pravastatin plus aspirin vs aspirin alone and 26% for pravastatin plus aspirin vs pravastatin alone. For ischemic stroke, the corresponding relative risk reductions were 29% and 31%. For the composite end point of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or ischemic stroke, the relative risk reductions were 24% and 13%. All relative risk reductions were statistically significant. Conclusion: More widespread and appropriate combined use of statins and aspirin in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease will avoid large numbers of premature deaths.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 44
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, VIT HLTH STAT, V1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, META ANAL MED HLTH P, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203909935
[3]  
*ASP MYOC INF STUD, 1980, CIRCULATION, V62, pV79
[4]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[5]   Presidential address: Quality of cardiovascular care in the US [J].
Beller, GA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) :587-594
[6]  
BREDDIN K, 1980, CIRCULATION, V62, P63
[7]   Underuse of aspirin in a referral population with documented coronary artery disease [J].
Califf, RM ;
DeLong, ER ;
Ostbye, T ;
Muhlbaier, LH ;
Chen, A ;
LaPointe, NA ;
Hammill, BG ;
McCants, CB ;
Kramer, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 89 (06) :653-661
[8]  
*CDP RES GROUP, 1976, J CHRON DIS, V29, P625
[9]   Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) [J].
Cleeman, JI ;
Grundy, SM ;
Becker, D ;
Clark, LT ;
Cooper, RS ;
Denke, MA ;
Howard, WJ ;
Hunninghake, DB ;
Illingworth, DR ;
Luepker, RV ;
McBride, P ;
McKenney, JM ;
Pasternak, RC ;
Stone, NJ ;
Van Horn, L ;
Brewer, HB ;
Ernst, ND ;
Gordon, D ;
Levy, D ;
Rifkind, B ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Savage, P ;
Haffner, SM ;
Orloff, DG ;
Proschan, MA ;
Schwartz, JS ;
Sempos, CT ;
Shero, ST ;
Murray, EZ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (19) :2486-2497
[10]  
COOK NR, 1999, MEDGENMED