Quantitative mapping of a precursory seismic quiescence to the Izu-Oshima 1990 (M6.5) earthquake, Japan

被引:31
作者
Wyss, M [1 ]
Shimazaki, K [1 ]
Urabe, T [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TOKYO,EARTHQUAKE RES INST,TOKYO,JAPAN
关键词
earthquake prediction; Japan; seismicity; seismic quiescence;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb04052.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A highly significant seismic quiescence with a standard deviate Z=10.1, corresponding to a 99 per cent confidence level, lasted from 1987.7 up to the 1990 February 20 Izu-Oshima M6.5 earthquake. The quiescent volume had dimensions of 30 km N-S and 10 km E-W and was centred below 14 km depth. Within the recently upgraded seismograph network of the Earthquake Research Institute (ERI), this main shock was the only one with a magnitude M > 5.8 in the upper 30 km of the crust for which the precursory quiescence hypothesis could be tested. Within a radius of 50 km, and during the observation period (1983.5-1995.9), there were no other 1.5 yr or longer periods of quiescence that were rated Z > 6.5 in the declustered earthquake catalogue, except one that was associated with volcanic activity. The total space-time covered by alarms, including the volcanic one, was less than 1 per cent at the Z = 6.5 level. The rarity of highly significant episodes of quiescence, and the correlation in space and time suggest that a precursory seismic quiescence started 2.5 yr before the Izu-Oshima 1990 earthquake in its source volume and to the north of it, and that it can be recognized with an alarm level of Z = 6.0, generating no false alarms. During the 1.5 yr quiescence window, only 10 earthquakes occurred in the quiet volume, whereas 50 events were expected based on the rate seen at other times. In randomly selected volumes containing 50, 100 and 200 events, the anomaly scored Z = 6.1 to 10.1. On the basis of the data from May 1983 to 1995, there is no highly significant quiescence currently present in the Izu-Oshima area.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Arabasz W. J., 1996, SEISMOL RES LETT, V67, P30
[2]  
AVILES CA, 1989, EOS, V70, P1228
[3]   SEISMICITY TRENDS AND POTENTIAL FOR LARGE EARTHQUAKES IN THE ALASKA-ALEUTIAN REGION [J].
BUFE, CG ;
NISHENKO, SP ;
VARNES, DJ .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1994, 142 (01) :83-99
[4]  
ENEVA M, 1995, GEOPHYS J INT, V116, P157
[5]   THE PRECURSORY EARTHQUAKE SWARM IN NEW-ZEALAND - HYPOTHESIS TESTS [J].
EVISON, FF ;
RHOADES, DA .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, 1993, 36 (01) :51-60
[6]   SEISMICITY RATE VARIATIONS AND SYSTEMATIC CHANGES IN MAGNITUDES IN TELESEISMIC CATALOGS [J].
HABERMANN, RE .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1991, 193 (04) :277-289
[7]   TELESEISMIC DETECTION IN THE ALEUTIAN ISLAND-ARC [J].
HABERMANN, RE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1983, 88 (NB6) :5056-5064
[8]  
HABERMANN RE, 1987, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V77, P141
[9]   PRECURSORY SEISMIC QUIESCENCE - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE [J].
HABERMANN, RE .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1988, 126 (2-4) :279-318
[10]  
HABERMANN RE, 1982, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V72, P93