Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation - Comparison with traumatic brain injury

被引:74
作者
Huang, ME
Cifu, DX
Keyser-Marcus, L
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rehabil & Res Ctr, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia Hosp, Rehabil & Res Training Ctr Support Employment, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
rehabilitation; function; outcome; brain tumor; traumatic brain injury;
D O I
10.1097/00002060-200007000-00003
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the functional outcome, length of stay, and discharge disposition of individuals with brain tumor versus those with acute traumatic brain injury. Design: In this study, 78 brain tumor patients were one-to-one matched by location of lesion and age with 78 acute traumatic brain injury patients. Outcome was measured by using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM 228) on admission and discharge. The FIM change and FIM efficiency were also calculated. FIM data were analyzed in three subsets, i.e., activities of daily living, mobility, and cognition. Discharge disposition and rehabilitation length of stay were also compared. Results: Demographic variables of race, marital status, and payer source were comparable for the two groups. No significant difference was found between the brain tumor and the traumatic brain injury populations with respect to total admission FIM, total discharge FIM, and FIM efficiency. The brain injury population had a significantly greater change in FIM. The tumor group had a significantly shorter rehabilitation length of stay and a greater discharge to community rate. Conclusions: Thus, individuals with brain tumor can achieve comparable functional outcome and have a shorter rehabilitation length of stay and greater discharge to community rate than individuals with brain injury.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 335
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   STROKE REHABILITATION OUTCOME - A POTENTIAL USE OF PREDICTIVE VARIABLES TO ESTABLISH LEVELS OF CARE [J].
ALEXANDER, MP .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :128-134
[2]  
ANDERSON TP, 1974, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V55, P545
[3]   Rehabilitation of the patient with brain tumor [J].
Bell, KR ;
O'Dell, MW ;
Barr, K ;
Yablon, SA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (03) :S37-S46
[4]  
Bloomfield SS., 1991, NEUROREHABILITATION, V1, P39, DOI [10.3233/NRE-1991-1206, DOI 10.3233/NRE-1991-1206]
[5]  
BONTKE CF, 1996, PHYS MED REHABILITAT, P1027
[6]  
CAREY RG, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P337
[7]  
CIFU DX, 1994, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V75, P56
[8]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY REHABILITATION - A REVIEW [J].
COPE, DN .
BRAIN INJURY, 1995, 9 (07) :649-670
[9]   Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury [J].
Corrigan, JD ;
SmithKnapp, K ;
Granger, CV .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (08) :828-834
[10]  
Garden FH, 1996, PHYSICAL MED REHABIL, P1199