Studying mixed grassland ecosystems I: suitable hyperspectral vegetation indices

被引:64
作者
He, Yuhong
Guo, Xulin [1 ]
Wilmshurst, John
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada
[2] Pk Canada, Western & No Serv Ctr, Winnipeg, MB R3B 0R9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.5589/m06-009
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Hyperspectral remote sensing data with a greater number of bands and narrower bandwidths can be effectively exploited for the study of ecosystem patterns and processes. Hyperspectral remote sensing of semiarid mixed grassland faces the following two challenges, however: (i) providing a good understanding of the performance of different vegetation indices (VIs) in estimating biophysical properties of grassland with a small amount of green vegetation, a large amount of dead material on the ground, and variable soil-ground conditions; and (ii) examining the spatial characterization of hyperspectral remotely sensed data to optimize sampling procedures and address scaling issues. Using ground-based hyperspectral and biophysical data, this study has compared the predictive capability of VIs for estimation of grassland leaf area index (LAI) (this paper) and examined the spatial variation of grassland LAI (the companion paper). The results in this paper indicate that the relationships between grassland LAI and VIs are significant. The performance of the renormalized difference vegetation index (RDVI), adjusted transformed soil-adjusted vegetation index (ATSAVI), and modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index 2 (MCARI2) was slightly better than that of the other VIs in the groups of ratio-based, soil-line-related, and chlorophyll-corrected VIs, respectively. By incorporating the cellulose absorption index (CAI) as a litter factor in ATSAVI, a new VI was computed (L-ATSAVI), and it improved the LAI estimation capability in our study area by about 10%.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Variability in leaf and litter optical properties: Implications for BRDF model inversions using AVHRR, MODIS, and MISR [J].
Asner, GP ;
Wessman, CA ;
Schimel, DS ;
Archer, S .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 63 (03) :243-257
[2]   SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY IN VEGETATION CANOPIES AND REMOTE-SENSING OF ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION - A MODELING STUDY [J].
ASRAR, G ;
MYNENI, RB ;
CHOUDHURY, BJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 41 (2-3) :85-103
[3]   SATELLITE-DERIVED LEAF-AREA-INDEX AND VEGETATION MAPS AS INPUT TO GLOBAL CARBON-CYCLE MODELS - A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH [J].
BADHWAR, GD ;
MACDONALD, RB ;
MEHTA, NC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1986, 7 (02) :265-281
[4]   Effects of soil color and brightness on vegetation indexes [J].
Bannari, A ;
Huete, AR ;
Morin, D ;
Zagolski, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 17 (10) :1885-1906
[5]   POTENTIALS AND LIMITS OF VEGETATION INDEXES FOR LAI AND APAR ASSESSMENT [J].
BARET, F ;
GUYOT, G .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 35 (2-3) :161-173
[6]   MODELED ANALYSIS OF THE BIOPHYSICAL NATURE OF SPECTRAL SHIFTS AND COMPARISON WITH INFORMATION-CONTENT OF BROAD BANDS [J].
BARET, F ;
JACQUEMOUD, S ;
GUYOT, G ;
LEPRIEUR, C .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 41 (2-3) :133-142
[7]  
Baret F., 1989, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1989. IGARSS'89/ 12th International Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing., 1989. IEEE, New York, P1355, DOI [10.1109/IGARSS.1989.576128, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.1989.576128]
[8]   IMPORTANCE OF LEAF-AREA INDEX AND FOREST TYPE WHEN ESTIMATING PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN BOREAL FORESTS [J].
BONAN, GB .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1993, 43 (03) :303-314
[9]   Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density [J].
Broge, NH ;
Leblanc, E .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 76 (02) :156-172
[10]  
Chen J. M., 1996, CAN J REMOTE SENS, V22, P229, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07038992.1996.10855178, https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.1996.10855178]