A note on "Solving linear programming problems under fuzziness and randomness environment using attainment values"

被引:6
作者
Chou, Shuo-Yan [1 ]
Lin, Jennifer Shu-Jen [2 ]
Julian, Peterson
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Technol & Vocat Educ, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Fuzzy linear programming; Fuzzy stochastic linear programming; Fuzzy number; Attainment values; Attainment index; EXPECTED VALUE; FUZZY; OPTIMIZATION; RANKING; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2009.08.013
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
080201 [机械制造及其自动化];
摘要
This paper is an amendment to Hop's paper INN. Hop, Solving linear programming problems under fuzziness and randomness environment using attainment values, Information Sciences 177 (2007) 2971-2984], in solving linear programming problems under fuzziness and randomness environments. Hop introduced a new characterization of relationship, attainment values, to enable the conversion of fuzzy (stochastic) linear programming models into corresponding deterministic linear programming models. The purpose of this paper is to provide a correction and an improvement of Hop's analytical work through rationalization and simplification. More importantly, it is shown that Hop's analysis does not support his demonstration or the solution-finding mechanism; the attainment values approach as he had proposed does not result in superior performance as compared to other existing approaches because it neglects some relevant and inevitable theoretical essentials. Two numerical examples from Hop's paper are also employed to show that his approach, in the conversion of fuzzy (stochastic) linear programming problems to corresponding problems, is questionable and can neither find the maximum nor the minimum in the examples. The models of the examples are subsequently amended in order to derive the correct optimal solutions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4083 / 4088
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
LINEAR-PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS AND RANKING OF FUZZY NUMBERS [J].
CAMPOS, L ;
VERDEGAY, JL .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 32 (01) :1-11
[2]
On the equivalence of two optimization methods for fuzzy linear programming problems [J].
Chanas, S ;
Zielinski, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 121 (01) :56-63
[3]
Fuzzy linear programming based on statistical confidence interval and interval-valued fuzzy set [J].
Chiang, JS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 129 (01) :65-86
[4]
Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation [J].
Fortemps, P ;
Roubens, M .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 82 (03) :319-330
[5]
Gao Y, 2008, IEEE INT CONF FUZZY, P1454
[6]
Estimating the expected value of fuzzy random variables in the stratified random sampling from finite populations [J].
García, D ;
Lubiano, MA ;
Alonso, MC .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2001, 138 (1-4) :165-184
[7]
Possibilistic linear programming:: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem [J].
Inuiguchi, M ;
Ramík, J .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 111 (01) :3-28
[8]
A suggested approach for possibility and necessity dominance indices in stochastic fuzzy linear programming [J].
Iskander, MG .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS, 2005, 18 (04) :395-399
[9]
Fuzzy linear programming using a penalty method [J].
Jamison, KD ;
Lodwick, WA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 119 (01) :97-110
[10]
Leung Y., 1988, SPATIAL ANAL PLANNIN