Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction - Impacts of density and nearby nature

被引:139
作者
Kearney, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
residential density; quality of life; benefits of nature;
D O I
10.1177/0013916505277607
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alternative patterns of residential development, going by names such as cluster housing and conservation subdivisions, opt to preserve large areas of shared outdoor space by increasing housing density on portions of the parcel. These alternative approaches arguably help preserve environmental quality, but how do they affect the people who live there? This study explored the impacts of residential density and nature areas on residents' satisfaction with their neighborhood. Survey results from 361 participants in nine different residential subdivisions showed that density and proximity to shared nature areas did not have a large impact on neighborhood satisfaction. More important were opportunities to visit nearby shared space and having views of nature from the home.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 139
页数:28
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J COMMUNITY DEV SOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], PLANNING COMMISSIONE
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OF CITY STREETS - RESIDENTS VIEWPOINT [J].
APPLEYARD, D ;
LINTELL, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1972, 38 (02) :84-101
[4]  
Arendt R, 1996, CONSERVATION DESIGN
[5]   CROWDING AND RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION IN THE URBAN-ENVIRONMENT - A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH [J].
BONNES, M ;
BONAIUTO, M ;
ERCOLANI, AP .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1991, 23 (05) :531-552
[6]  
BRESSI TW, 1992, UTNE READER, V51, P101
[7]  
Calthorpe Peter., 1989, PEDESTRIAN POCKET BO, P7
[8]  
Churchman A., 1999, J PLAN LIT, V13, P389
[9]   Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing [J].
Coley, RL ;
Kuo, FE ;
Sullivan, WC .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1997, 29 (04) :468-494
[10]   TOWARD A PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF CROWDING [J].
DESOR, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 21 (01) :79-&