A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal

被引:116
作者
Bouza, Emilio
Alvarado, Neisa
Alcala, Luis
Jesus Perez, Maria
Rincon, Cristina
Munoz, Patricia
机构
[1] Univ Madrid, Hosp Gen Gregorio Maranon, Serv Microbiol Clin & Infecciosas VIH, Madrid 28007, Spain
[2] Univ Madrid, Hosp Gen Gregorio Maranon, Postoperat Intens Care Unit Heart Surg, Madrid 28007, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1086/511865
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Suspicion of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) leads frequently to unnecessary catheter withdrawals, and many catheter-tip cultures yield negative results. The objective of this study was to compare the yield of 3 microbiological procedures to assess CR-BSI without catheter withdrawal. Methods. The study was prospectively performed in a group of patients without neutropenia or blood disorders who were admitted to the intensive care unit during a 37-month period with sepsis suspected on clinical grounds and who had central venous catheters inserted for 148 h. The microbiological procedures compared were semi-quantitative cultures from hub and skin (superficial), differential quantitative blood cultures, and differential time to positivity between cultures of blood obtained from catheter hubs and peripheral blood. Results. Of the 204 episodes of suspected CR-BSI included in the study, 28 were confirmed to be CR-BSI. We obtained the following results for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy: superficial cultures, 78.6%, 92.0%, 61.1%, 96.4%, and 90.2%, respectively; differential quantitative blood cultures, 71.4%, 97.7%, 83.3%, 95.6%, and 94.1%, respectively; and differential time to positivity, 96.4%, 90.3%, 61.4%, 99.4%, and 91.2%, respectively. Conclusions. CR-BSI can be assessed without catheter withdrawal in patients without neutropenia or blood disorders who have catheters inserted for a short time and are hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Convenience, use of resources, and expertise should determine the technique of choice in different medical contexts. Because of ease of performance, low cost, and wide availability, we recommend combining semiquantitative superficial cultures and peripheral vein blood cultures to screen for CR-BSI, leaving differential quantitative blood cultures as a confirmatory and more specific technique.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 826
页数:7
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF STANDARD AND QUANTITATIVE BLOOD CULTURES IN THE EVALUATION OF CHILDREN WITH SUSPECTED CENTRAL VENOUS LINE SEPSIS [J].
ASCHER, DP ;
SHOUPE, BA ;
ROBB, M ;
MAYBEE, DA ;
FISCHER, GW .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1992, 15 (06) :499-503
[2]   Serial surveillance cultures of skin and catheter hub specimens from critically ill patients with central venous catheters: Molecular epidemiology of infection and implications for clinical management and research [J].
Atela, I ;
Coll, P ;
Rello, J ;
Quintana, E ;
Barrio, J ;
March, F ;
Sanchez, F ;
Barraquer, P ;
Ballus, J ;
Cotura, A ;
Prats, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (07) :1784-1790
[3]  
BENEZRA D, 1988, AM J MED, V85, P495
[4]   Antibiotic lock technique: Review of the literature [J].
Bestul, MB ;
VandenBussche, HL .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 25 (02) :211-227
[5]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF THE LYSIS-CENTRIFUGATION BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF FUNGEMIA AND COMPARISON WITH A CONVENTIONAL BIPHASIC BROTH BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEM [J].
BILLE, J ;
EDSON, RS ;
ROBERTS, GD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (02) :126-128
[6]   Earlier positivity of central-venous- versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis [J].
Blot, F ;
Schmidt, E ;
Nitenberg, G ;
Tancrède, C ;
Leclercq, B ;
Laplanche, A ;
Andremont, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :105-109
[7]   Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures [J].
Blot, F ;
Nitenberg, G ;
Chachaty, E ;
Raynard, B ;
Germann, N ;
Antoun, S ;
Laplanche, A ;
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Tancrede, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9184) :1071-1077
[8]   A prospective, randomized, and comparative study of 3 different methods for the diagnosis of intravascular catheter colonization [J].
Bouza, E ;
Alvarado, N ;
Alcalá, L ;
Sánchez-Conde, M ;
Pérez, MJ ;
Muñoz, P ;
Martín-Rabadán, P ;
Rodríguez-Créixems, M .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 40 (08) :1096-1100
[9]   A European perspective on intravascular catheter-related infections:: report on the microbiology workload, aetiology and antimicrobial susceptibility (ESGNI-005 Study) [J].
Bouza, E ;
San Juan, R ;
Muñoz, P ;
Pascau, J ;
Voss, A ;
Desco, M .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (09) :838-842
[10]   Intravascular catheter-related infections: a growing problem, the search for better solutions [J].
Bouza, E .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2002, 8 (05) :255-255