Mediatization of politics: Theory and data

被引:88
作者
Kepplinger, HM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Inst Commun Studies, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02584.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article reports causes and consequences of the mediatization of politics about activities of the German parliament (Der Bundestag) and coverage of German politics in three national newspapers during 1951-1995. During this period, the number of decision-making activities remained fairly constant, the number of information activities significantly increased, and coverage of German politics changed: Although the number of reports triggered by events and issues remained fairly constant, the number of stories triggered by statements (about events or issues) significantly increased and those triggered by statements made by politicians increasingly overshadowed articles triggered by nonpoliticians. Declarations of actions and demands for action, in particular, seemed to trigger articles, which indicates a growing importance of symbolic politics and has implications for citizens' relations to decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 986
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Altheide D.L., 1979, Media logic
[2]  
[Anonymous], KAMPA MEINUNGSKLIMA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, TRENNUNG NACHRICHT M
[4]  
[Anonymous], PARADOX MASS POLITIC
[5]  
BRINT S., 1994, In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life
[6]  
CHAGALL D, 1981, NEW KINGMAKERS
[7]  
Delli Carpini MichaelX., 1996, What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters
[8]  
*DTSCH BUND, 1996, CHRON DTSCH BUND, V12
[9]  
Entman Robert., 1989, DEMOCRACY CITIZENS M
[10]  
Ismayr Wolfgang, 1992, DTSCH BUNDESTAG FUNK