Chronic pain management in a health maintenance organization

被引:16
作者
McCarberg, B [1 ]
Wolf, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
chronic pain; health maintenance organization; group treatment; cognitive-behavioral; control group; outcomes;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-199903000-00008
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate thp management of chronic pain in a large health maintenance organization using cognitive-behavioral techniques and a blinded control group. Design: Subjects were randomized into two groups. All participants completed a self-administered baseline questionnaire and were mailed a self-administered 6-month follow-up questionnaire. Setting: This study examines chronic pain management in a large, established health maintenance organization. Patients: Patients were members of a health maintenance organization, had pain for at least 6 months, and had failed all known treatment regimens. Interventions: The treatment group participated in a 16-hour, 8-week class teaching cognitive-behavioral techniques, the relaxation response, meditation, and stress management. The minimal treatment group received a home-study manual. Outcome Measures: Behavioral, outcomes, function, and pain severity and also patient satisfaction were measured. Results: Both the treatment and minimal treatment groups exhibited improvement in pain severity, negative mood, pain affect, and gain interference with the patient's life. Conclusion: Gains were achieved in pain severity negative mood, pain affect, self-control, and pain interference with the patient's life. Other behavioral variables and activity did not improve. Except in self-control, pain affect, and distracting responses from their significant others, the blinded minimal treatment group demonstrated similar findings. Patient satisfaction with treatment strongly favored the treatment group with over 78% of the treatment participants satisfied with the care provided.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 57
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PSYCHOL APPROACHES P
[2]  
Barkin RL, 1996, DM-DIS MON, V42, P389
[3]   MIGRAINE AND TENSION HEADACHE - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW [J].
BLANCHARD, EB ;
ANDRASIK, F ;
AHLES, TA ;
TEDERS, SJ ;
OKEEFE, D .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1980, 11 (05) :613-631
[4]   Pitfalls of patient education - Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care [J].
Cherkin, DC ;
Deyo, RA ;
Street, JH ;
Hunt, M ;
Barlow, W .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (03) :345-355
[5]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381
[6]  
FEDERICO JV, 1996, CROSSROADS PRACTICAL, P249
[7]   EFFICACY OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY PAIN TREATMENT CENTERS - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW [J].
FLOR, H ;
FYDRICH, T ;
TURK, DC .
PAIN, 1992, 49 (02) :221-230
[8]   CHRONIC BACK PAIN AND RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - PREDICTING PAIN AND DISABILITY FROM COGNITIVE VARIABLES [J].
FLOR, H ;
TURK, DC .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1988, 11 (03) :251-265
[9]  
HOLZMAN AD, 1986, PAIN MANAGEMENT HDB, P31
[10]   ASSESSING THE AFFECTIVE COMPONENT OF CHRONIC PAIN - DEVELOPMENT OF THE PAIN DISCOMFORT SCALE [J].
JENSEN, MP ;
KAROLY, P ;
HARRIS, P .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1991, 35 (2-3) :149-154