Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: Evaluation in large incident cohorts

被引:167
作者
Guo, A [1 ]
Mujais, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Baxter Healthcare Corp, Div Renal, Mcgaw Pk, IL 60085 USA
关键词
continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; end-stage renal disease; hemodialysis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.08801.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Secular trends in dialysis require a frequent re-examination of outcomes in patients on renal replacement modalities. We examined three large cohorts of patients initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 1999, 2000, and 2001 (total of >30,000 patients) to ascertain trends in patient outcomes, technique success, and predictors of both parameters of interest. Trends toward improved patient survival, higher technique success, and increasing use of cycler-based therapy, with more recent calendar years were noted. Age and diabetes were clear predictors of patient survival, but did not appear to influence technique success. Technique success was higher in patients on automated PD (APD) than in patients on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD), but this difference was mostly concentrated in the first year on therapy. Patients starting PD after a failed allograft had excellent survival. We conclude that the current state of PD in the United States is characterized by improving patient outcomes, higher technique success, and a predominance of use of cycler-based therapy. Several opportunities for improving technique success amenable to practice interventions have been identified. The high success of PD in patients with failed allograft suggests that it is beneficial to utilize this modality more frequently in this patient group than current practice.
引用
收藏
页码:S3 / S12
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Anderson JE, 1997, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V17, P255
[2]   The effects of comorbid conditions on the outcomes of patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis [J].
Beddhu, S ;
Zeidel, ML ;
Saul, M ;
Seddon, P ;
Samore, MH ;
Stoddard, GJ ;
Bruns, FJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (09) :696-701
[3]  
Bistrup C, 1996, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V16, P90
[4]   Trends in patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis and strategies: How are we doing and how can we do better? [J].
Blake, PG .
ADVANCES IN RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY, 2000, 7 (04) :324-337
[5]  
BLOEMBERGEN WE, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P184
[6]   Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis [J].
Collins, AJ ;
Hao, WL ;
Xia, H ;
Ebben, JP ;
Everson, SE ;
Constantini, EG ;
Ma, JZ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1999, 34 (06) :1065-1074
[7]  
Cueto-Manzano AM, 2001, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V21, P148
[8]  
Davies SJ, 2001, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V21, pS280
[9]   CLINICAL EFFICACY AND MORBIDITY ASSOCIATED WITH CONTINUOUS CYCLIC COMPARED WITH CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS [J].
DEFIJTER, CWH ;
OE, LP ;
NAUTA, JJP ;
VANDERMEULEN, J ;
VERBRUGH, HA ;
VERHOEF, J ;
DONKER, AJM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (04) :264-271
[10]   Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates [J].
Fenton, SSA ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Desmeules, M ;
Morrison, HI ;
Mao, Y ;
Copleston, P ;
Jeffery, JR ;
Kjellstrand, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 30 (03) :334-342