Spatial variation in mink and muskrat interactions in Canada

被引:26
作者
Erb, J
Boyce, MS
Stenseth, NC
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Zool & Physiol, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Sci Biol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Biol, Div Zool, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930302.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We investigated the spatial attributes of mink (Mustela vison) and muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) interactions in Canada using 160 geographically paired historic time series of mink (n = 80) and muskrat (n = 80) harvest data obtained from Hudson's Bay Co. Archives. All series were 25 years in length (1925-1949) and were distributed primarily throughout five ecozones. We used autoregressive models and cross-correlation analysis to characterize the interactions between mink and muskrat. Model selection results did not differ among ecozones, and indicated that a predator-prey autoregressive model incorporating a delayed density-dependent term best described both the mink and muskrat harvest time series. Subsequent analysis of autoregressive coefficients and estimated lags indicated that mink and muskrat interactions vary throughout Canada. In western Canada, the trophic interactions appear to be strong, and mink population cycles lag behind muskrats 2-3 years. In central Canada, mink harvests lagged behind muskrats 1 year, and mink and muskrat interactions in central Canada, with the exception of the Hudson Plains ecozone, were intermediate. In eastern Canada, the trophic interactions appeared weakest, and there were no distinct time lags between mink and muskrat. Stronger interactions in western Canada may be a result of decreased prey diversity, forcing mink to specialize more on muskrats, whereas comparatively stronger perturbations stemming From other trophic interactions may alter the estimated interaction between mink and muskrat in eastern Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF PREDATION ON RODENT POPULATIONS [J].
ANDERSSON, M ;
ERLINGE, S .
OIKOS, 1977, 29 (03) :591-597
[2]   ROLE OF PREDATION IN SHORT-TERM POPULATION FLUCTUATIONS OF SOME BIRDS AND MAMMALS IN FENNOSCANDIA [J].
ANGELSTAM, P ;
LINDSTROM, E ;
WIDEN, P .
OECOLOGIA, 1984, 62 (02) :199-208
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1942, VOLES MICE LEMMINGS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1973, Stability and complexity in model ecosystems
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ANAL POPULATION ECOL
[6]  
Banfield AWF, 1974, MAMMALS CANADA
[7]   GEOGRAPHIC GRADIENT IN SMALL RODENT DENSITY-FLUCTUATIONS - A STATISTICAL MODELING APPROACH [J].
BJORNSTAD, ON ;
FALCK, W ;
STENSETH, NC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 262 (1364) :127-133
[8]  
Boutin S., 1987, P314
[9]   PHASE RELATIONS IN 10 YEAR CYCLE [J].
BULMER, MG .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1975, 44 (02) :609-621
[10]   STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF 10-YEAR CYCLE IN CANADA [J].
BULMER, MG .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1974, 43 (03) :701-717