Cigarette smoking and subsequent risk of lung cancer in men and women: analysis of a prospective cohort study

被引:199
作者
Freedman, Neal D. [1 ,2 ]
Leitzmann, Michael F. [1 ]
Hollenbeck, Albert R. [3 ]
Schatzkin, Arthur [1 ]
Abnet, Christian C. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Nutr Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH,DHHS, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Off Director, NIH,DHHS, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[3] AARP, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70154-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Whether women are more susceptible than men to lung cancer caused by cigarette smoking has been controversial. To address this question, we aimed to compare incidence rates of lung cancer by stratum of smoking use in men and women of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP cohort. Methods Participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health study responded to a postal questionnaire between Oct 13, 1995, and May 6, 1996, and were followed up until Dec 31, 2003. The questionnaire asked participants about their past and current smoking status, demographics, alcohol intake, tobacco smoking, physical activity, and included a food-frequency questionnaire of 124 items. Incident lung cancers were identified by linkage to individual state cancer registries. We present age-standardised incidence rates for cancer and multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for potential confounders, with 95% CIs. This study conforms to the STROBE guidelines. Findings 279214 men and 184623 women from eight states in the USA aged 50-71 years at study baseline were included in this analysis. During follow-up, lung cancers occurred in 4097 men and 2237 women. Incidence rates were 20.3 (95% Cl 16.3-24.3) per 100000 person-years in men who had never smoked (99 cancers) and 25.3 (21.3-29.3) in women who had never smoked (152 cancers); for this group, the adjusted HR for lung cancer was 1.3 (1.0-1.8) for women compared with men. Smoking was associated with increased risk of lung cancer in men and women. The incidence rate of current smokers who smoked more than two packs per day was 1259.2 (1035.0-1483.3) in men and 1308.9 (924.2-1693.6) in women. In current smokers, in a model adjusted for typical smoking dose, the HR was 0.9 (0.8-0.9) for women compared with men. For former smokers, in a model adjusted for years of cessation and typical smoking dose, the HR was 0.9 (0.9-1.0) for women compared with men. Incidence rates of adenocarcinoma, small-cell carcinoma, and undifferentiated tumours were similar in men and women; incidence rates of squamous tumours in men were about twice that in women. Interpretation Our findings suggest that women are not more susceptible than men to the carcinogenic effects of cigarette smoking in the lung. In smokers, incidence rates tended to be higher in men than women with comparable smoking histories, but differences were modest; smoking was strongly associated with lung cancer risk in both men and women. Future studies should confirm whether incidence rates are indeed higher in women who have never smoked than in men who have never smoked.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 656
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, HLTH CONS SMOK REP S
  • [2] Are there gender differences in self-reported smoking practices? Correlation with thiocyanate and cotinine levels in smokers and nonsmokers from the Pawtucket Heart Health Program
    Assaf, AR
    Parker, D
    Lapane, KL
    McKenney, JL
    Carleton, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (10): : 899 - 906
  • [3] Lung cancer rates in men and women with comparable histories of smoking
    Bain, C
    Feskanich, D
    Speizer, FE
    Thun, M
    Hertzmark, E
    Rosner, BA
    Colditz, GA
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (11): : 826 - 834
  • [4] Are women more susceptible to lung cancer?
    Blot, WJ
    McLaughlin, JK
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (11): : 812 - 813
  • [5] Serum cotinine level as predictor of lung cancer risk
    Boffetta, Paolo
    Clark, Sarah
    Shen, Min
    Gislefoss, Randi
    Peto, Richard
    Andersen, Aage
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (06) : 1184 - 1188
  • [6] Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer mortality in the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study II
    Cardenas, VM
    Thun, MJ
    Austin, H
    Lally, CA
    Clark, WS
    Greenberg, RS
    Heath, CW
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1997, 8 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [7] A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Leitzmann, Michael F.
    Gail, Mitchell H.
    Hollenbeck, Albert R.
    Schatzkin, Arthur
    Sinha, Rashmi
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2007, 4 (12) : 1973 - 1984
  • [8] International lung cancer trends by histologic type:: male:female differences diminishing and adenocarcinoma rates rising
    Devesa, SS
    Bray, F
    Vizcaino, AP
    Parkin, DM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 117 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [9] Nicotine regulates smoking patterns
    Djordjevic, MV
    Hoffmann, D
    Hoffmann, I
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 26 (04) : 435 - 440
  • [10] Fruit and vegetable intake and esophageal cancer in a large prospective cohort study
    Freedman, Neal D.
    Park, Yikyung
    Subar, Amy F.
    Hollenbeck, Albert R.
    Leitzmann, Michael F.
    Schatzkin, Arthur
    Abnet, Christian C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 121 (12) : 2753 - 2760