Ecological indicators:: Between the two fires of science and policy

被引:256
作者
Turnhout, Esther [1 ]
Hisschemoller, Matthijs [1 ]
Eijsackers, Herman [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Inst Ecol Sci, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ecological indicator; nature conservation policy; boundary work; knowledge utilization; science policy interface;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.12.003
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This article approaches the concept of ecological indicators from a social science perspective. By applying theoretical concepts from policy analysis and social studies of science about knowledge utilization, problem structuring and the boundaries between science and policy to the issue of ecological indicators, we aim to contribute to our understanding not only of the development but more importantly of the actual use of ecological indicators in policy processes and the importance of political context. Our interest is in those ecological indicators that attempt to measure the ecological quality of ecosystems and that can be or are specifically developed to be used as instruments to evaluate the effects of policies on nature. We claim that these indicators, although they are highly dependent on scientific knowledge, cannot be solely science-based, due to the complexity of ecosystems and the normative aspects involved in assessing ecosystem quality. As a result, we situate ecological indicators in a fuzzy area between science and policy and between the production and the use of scientific knowledge. We will argue that ecological indicators can be expected to be used or rejected strategically, dependent on policy context. Furthermore we will argue that ecological indicators cannot be evaluated with traditional scientific quality criteria alone. The article concludes with some lessons for future indicator development one of them being the inclusion of stakeholder perspectives. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 228
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Applications of ecosystem health for the sustainability of managed systems in Costa Rica [J].
Aguilar, BJ .
ECOSYSTEM HEALTH, 1999, 5 (01) :36-48
[2]  
[Anonymous], LANDSC RES, DOI DOI 10.1080/713684668
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV MODELING ASSESSM
[5]   Aspects of landscape or nature quality [J].
Arler, F .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) :291-302
[6]  
BEST EPH, 1984, ECOLOGISCHE INDICATO
[7]  
BEST EPH, 1984, ECOL INDICATOREN KWA
[8]  
BOSSEL H., 1996, Environ Model Assess, V1, P193, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01872150
[9]  
Bowker G.C., 1999, SORTING THINGS OUT C
[10]  
Collingridge D., 1986, Science speaks to power: the role of experts in policy making