Studying large-scale programmes to improve patient safety in whole care systems: Challenges for research

被引:68
作者
Benn, Jonathan [1 ]
Burnett, Susan [1 ]
Parand, Anam [1 ]
Pinto, Anna [1 ]
Iskander, Sandra [1 ]
Vincent, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Biosurg & Surg Technol, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
Patient safety; Quality improvement programmes; Health care organisations; Methods; Safer Patients Initiative; UK; STATISTICAL PROCESS-CONTROL; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; FRAMEWORK; EPISTEMOLOGY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.051
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Large-scale national and multi-institutional patient safety improvement programmes are being developed in the health care systems of several countries to address problems in the reliability of care delivered to patients. Drawing upon popular collaborative improvement models, these campaigns are ambitious in their aims to improve patient safety in macro-level systems such as whole health care organisations. This article considers the methodological issues involved in conducting research and evaluation of these programmes. Several specific research challenges are outlined, which result from the complexity of longitudinal, multi-level intervention programmes and the variable, highly sociotechnical care systems, with which they interact. Organisational-level improvement programmes are often underspecified due to local variations in context and organisational readiness for improvement work. The result is variable implementation patterns and local adaptations. Programme effects span levels and other boundaries within a system, vary dynamically or are cumulative over time and are problematic to understand in terms of cause and effect, where concurrent external influences exist and the impact upon study endpoints may be mediated by a range of organisational and social factors. We outline the methodological approach to research in the United Kingdom Safer Patients Initiative, to exemplify how some of the challenges for research in this area can be met through a multi-method, longitudinal research design. Specifically, effective research designs must be sensitive to complex variation, through employing multiple qualitative and quantitative measures, collect data over time to understand change and utilise descriptive techniques to capture specific interactions between programme and context for implementation. When considering the long-term, sustained impact of an improvement programme, researchers must consider how to define and measure the capability for continuous safe and reliable care as a property of the whole care system. This requires a sociotechnical approach, rather than focusing upon one microsystem, disciplinary perspective or single level of the system. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1767 / 1776
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems [J].
Amalberti, R .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2001, 37 (2-3) :109-126
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], ACTION EVALUATION HL
[4]  
Ayers Lea R, 2005, Qual Manag Health Care, V14, P234
[5]   Understanding the complexity of redesigning care around the clinical microsystem [J].
Barach, P. ;
Johnson, J. K. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 :I10-I16
[6]  
BATALDEN PB, 2007, QUALITY DESIGN CLIN
[7]  
Bate P., 2008, ORG QUALITY IMPROVEM
[8]  
BATE P, 2002, REPORT BREAKTHROUGH
[9]   Perceptions of the impact of a large-scale collaborative improvement programme: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative [J].
Benn, Jonathan ;
Burnett, Susan ;
Parand, Anam ;
Pinto, Anna ;
Iskander, Sandra ;
Vincent, Charles .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (03) :524-540
[10]   Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement [J].
Benneyan, JC ;
Lloyd, RC ;
Plsek, PE .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (06) :458-464