Double-blind test program for astrometric planet detection with Gaia

被引:112
作者
Casertano, S. [1 ]
Lattanzi, M. G. [2 ]
Sozzetti, A. [2 ,3 ]
Spagna, A. [2 ]
Jancart, S. [4 ]
Morbidelli, R. [2 ]
Pannunzio, R. [2 ]
Pourbaix, D. [4 ]
Queloz, D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Osserv Astron Torino, INAF, I-10025 Pino Torinese, Italy
[3] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Astron & Astrophys, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Observ Geneva, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland
关键词
stars : planetary systems; astrometry; methods : data analysis; methods : numerical; methods : statistical; stars : statistics;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20078997
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Aims. The scope of this paper is twofold. First, it describes the simulation scenarios and the results of a large-scale, double-blind test campaign carried out to estimate the potential of Gaia for detecting and measuring planetary systems. The identified capabilities are then put in context by highlighting the unique contribution that the Gaia exoplanet discoveries will be able to bring to the science of extrasolar planets in the next decade. Methods. We use detailed simulations of the Gaia observations of synthetic planetary systems and develop and utilize independent software codes in double-blind mode to analyze the data, including statistical tools for planet detection and different algorithms for single and multiple Keplerian orbit fitting that use no a priori knowledge of the true orbital parameters of the systems. Results. 1) Planets with astrometric signatures alpha similar or equal to 3 times the assumed single-measurement error sigma(psi) and period P <= 5 yr can be detected reliably and consistently, with a very small number of false positives. 2) At twice the detection limit, uncertainties in orbital parameters and masses are typically 15-20%. 3) Over 70% of two-planet systems with well-separated periods in the range 0.2 <= P <= 3 9 yr, astrometric signal-to-noise ratio 2 <= alpha/sigma(psi) <= 50, and eccentricity e <= 0.6 are correctly identified. 4) Favorable orbital configurations (both planets with P <= 4 yr and alpha/sigma(psi) = 10, redundancy over a factor of 2 in the number of observations) have orbital elements measured to better than 10% accuracy > 90% of the time, and the value of the mutual inclination angle i(rel) determined with uncertainties <= 10 degrees.5) Finally, nominal uncertainties obtained from the fitting procedures are a good estimate of the actual errors in the orbit reconstruction. Extrapolating from the present-day statistical properties of the exoplanet sample, the results imply that a Gaia with sigma(psi) = 8 mu as, in its unbiased and complete magnitude-limited census of planetary systems, will discover and measure several thousands of giant planets out to 3-4 AUs from stars within 200 pc, and will characterize hundreds of multiple-planet systems, including meaningful coplanarity tests. Finally, we put Gaia's planet discovery potential into context, identifying several areas of planetary-system science (statistical properties and correlations, comparisons with predictions from theoretical models of formation and evolution, interpretation of direct detections) in which Gaia can be expected, on the basis of our results, to have a relevant impact, when combined with data coming from other ongoing and future planet search programs.
引用
收藏
页码:699 / 729
页数:31
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Aerts C., 2002, ASP C SER, V259, P626
  • [2] On detecting terrestrial planets with timing of giant planet transits
    Agol, E
    Steffen, J
    Sari, R
    Clarkson, W
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 359 (02) : 567 - 579
  • [3] Models of giant planet formation with migration and disc evolution
    Alibert, Y
    Mordasini, C
    Benz, W
    Winisdoerffer, C
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2005, 434 (01) : 343 - 353
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, PROTOSTARS PLANETS, DOI DOI 10.1089/15311070260192246
  • [5] Predictions for the frequency and orbital radii of massive extrasolar planets
    Armitage, PJ
    Livio, M
    Lubow, SH
    Pringle, JE
    [J]. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 334 (01) : 248 - 256
  • [6] HAT-P-5b:: a jupiter-like hot jupiter transiting a bright star
    Bakos, G. A.
    Shporer, A.
    Pal, A.
    Torres, G.
    Kovacs, Geza
    Latham, D. W.
    Mazeh, T.
    Ofir, A.
    Noyes, R. W.
    Sasselov, D. D.
    Bouchy, F.
    Pont, F.
    Queloz, D.
    Udry, S.
    Esquerdo, G.
    Sipocz, B.
    Kovacs, Gabor
    Stefanik, R.
    Lazar, J.
    Papp, I.
    Sari, P.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2007, 671 (02): : L173 - L176
  • [7] Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458
    Baraffe, I
    Chabrier, G
    Barman, TS
    Allard, F
    Hauschildt, PH
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, 402 (02) : 701 - 712
  • [8] The (in)stability of planetary systems
    Barnes, R
    Quinn, T
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 611 (01) : 494 - 516
  • [9] The mass of the candidate exoplanet companion to HD 33636 from Hubble Space Telescope astrometry and high-precision radial velocities
    Bean, Jacob L.
    McArthur, Barbara E.
    Benedict, G. Fritz
    Harrison, Thomas E.
    Bizyaev, Dmitry
    Nelan, Edmund
    Smith, Verne V.
    [J]. ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 134 (02) : 749 - 758
  • [10] Discovery of a cool planet of 5.5 Earth masses through gravitational microlensing
    Beaulieu, JP
    Bennett, DP
    Fouqué, P
    Williams, A
    Dominik, M
    Jorgensen, UG
    Kubas, D
    Cassan, A
    Coutures, C
    Greenhill, J
    Hill, K
    Menzies, J
    Sackett, PD
    Albrow, M
    Brillant, S
    Caldwell, JAR
    Calitz, JJ
    Cook, KH
    Corrales, E
    Desort, M
    Dieters, S
    Dominis, D
    Donatowicz, J
    Hoffman, M
    Kane, S
    Marquette, JB
    Martin, R
    Meintjes, P
    Pollard, K
    Sahu, K
    Vinter, C
    Wambsganss, J
    Woller, K
    Horne, K
    Steele, I
    Bramich, DM
    Burgdorf, M
    Snodgrass, C
    Bode, M
    Udalski, A
    Szymanski, MK
    Kubiak, M
    Wieckowski, T
    Pietrzynski, G
    Soszynski, I
    Szewczyk, O
    Wyrzykowski, L
    Paczynski, B
    Abe, F
    Bond, IA
    [J]. NATURE, 2006, 439 (7075) : 437 - 440