Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats

被引:45
作者
Brase, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunderland, Sunderland Business Sch, Div Psychol, Sunderland SR6 0DD, England
关键词
judgment under uncertainty; reasoning; probability judgment; stimulus ambiguity; problem solving; social influence; rationality;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.421
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research suggesting both a superiority of frequencies over single-event probabilities and of smaller reference classes over very large reference classes have utilized tasks that vary in computational complexity. The present research sought to simply and directly evaluate if-apart from simplifying statistical inference tasks-frequencies and small reference classes are clearer than other formats. After eliminating possible computational confounds, simple frequencies (based on small reference classes, e.g. 1/3) and to some extent relative frequencies (percentages, e.g. 33%) were perceived as clearer than absolute frequencies (based on very large reference classes, e.g. 90 million Americans) and single-event probabilities (e.g. 0.33). Concurrently, these different formats were evaluated in terms of their relative influence. Absolute frequencies were relatively more persuasive for smaller magnitudes (e.g. 2.7 million) but less persuasive for larger magnitudes (e.g. 267 million), as compared to analogous presentations. Single-event probabilities were judged to minimize the significance of information. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 401
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Aitchison J., 1975, Statistical Prediction Analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, ED EVALUATION POLICY
[4]   Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: The role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty [J].
Brase, GL ;
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :3-21
[5]  
BRASE GL, IN PRESS LEARNING IN
[6]   Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty [J].
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (01) :1-73
[7]   Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems [J].
Evans, JSBT ;
Handley, SJ ;
Perham, N ;
Over, DE ;
Thompson, VA .
COGNITION, 2000, 77 (03) :197-213
[8]  
FETHERSTONHAUGH D, 1998, PSYCHOL PEACEKEEPING, P75
[9]   THE RISKS OF PUTTING THE NUMBERS IN CONTEXT - A CAUTIONARY TALE [J].
FREUDENBURG, WR ;
RURSCH, JA .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :949-958
[10]   PREVERBAL AND VERBAL COUNTING AND COMPUTATION [J].
GALLISTEL, CR ;
GELMAN, R .
COGNITION, 1992, 44 (1-2) :43-74