You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences

被引:51
作者
Demaree, Heath A. [1 ]
DeDonno, Michael A. [1 ]
Burns, Kevin J. [2 ]
Everhart, D. Erik [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Psychol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Mitre Corp, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Dept Psychol, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, Program Neurosci, Greenville, NC USA
关键词
risk-taking; personality; gambling; assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals exhibit personal preferences in gambling games, like slot machines, even when their options are economically equivalent. Here we explore how personality differences affect risk-taking preferences in slot-like games that vary along two dimensions of a risk space, namely the wager amount or "utility" (in a "W-game") and the winning chances or "probability" (in a "P-game"). The independent variables are personality measurements made by three scales: the Behavioral Inhibition/Activation Scales (BIS/ BAS), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, and the Zuckerman Sensation-Seeking Scale. Our results suggest that risk-taking is governed more by concern for a loss (measured by BIS) than desire for a win (measured by BAS), although both variables impact risk-taking preferences. We also find that Sensation-Seeking relates more to the chances (probability) of a win than the amount (utility) of a win. Impulsivity did not affect players' choices in either game, presumably because it affects the choice to play or not play in the first place. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1484 / 1494
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J CONSULTING PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0040995
[2]   Controlling the integration of emotion and cognition - The role of frontal cortex in distinguishing helpful from hurtful emotional information [J].
Beer, JS ;
Knight, RT ;
D'Esposito, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (05) :448-453
[3]   EXPOSITION OF A NEW THEORY ON THE MEASUREMENT OF RISK [J].
Bernoulli, Daniel .
ECONOMETRICA, 1954, 22 (01) :23-36
[4]  
Burns K, 2007, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V71, P153
[5]   BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION, BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION, AND AFFECTIVE RESPONSES TO IMPENDING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT - THE BIS BAS SCALES [J].
CARVER, CS ;
WHITE, TL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 67 (02) :319-333
[6]   Responsiveness to threats and incentives, expectancy of recurrence, and distress and disengagement: Moderator effects in women with early stage breast cancer [J].
Carver, CS ;
Meyer, B ;
Antoni, MH .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (06) :965-975
[7]   Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients [J].
Cavedini, P ;
Riboldi, G ;
Keller, R ;
D'Annucci, A ;
Bellodi, L .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (04) :334-341
[8]   HUMAN PREFRONTAL LESIONS INCREASE DISTRACTIBILITY TO IRRELEVANT SENSORY INPUTS [J].
CHAO, LL ;
KNIGHT, RT .
NEUROREPORT, 1995, 6 (12) :1605-1610
[9]   Impulsivity as a mediator in the relationship between depression and problem gambling [J].
Clarke, D .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (01) :5-15
[10]  
Depue R. A., 1993, BASIC ISSUES PSYCHOP, P127