Interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an independent expert nuclear medicine evaluation of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E3404 study

被引:103
作者
Horning, Sandra J. [1 ]
Juweid, Malik E. [2 ]
Schoeder, Heiko [3 ]
Wiseman, Gregory [4 ]
McMillan, Alex [5 ]
Swinnen, Lode J. [6 ]
Advani, Ranjana [1 ]
Gascoyne, Randy [7 ]
Quon, Andrew [8 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Stat Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Pathol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[8] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RESPONSE ASSESSMENT; FDG-PET; RITUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1182/blood-2009-08-234351
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans are thought to be associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In the E3404 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma study, PET scans at baseline and after 3 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were centrally reviewed by a single reader. To determine the reproducibility of interim PET interpretation, an expert panel of 3 external nuclear medicine physicians visually scored baseline and interim PET scans independently and were blinded to clinical information. The binary Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study criteria were based on modifications of the Harmonization Criteria; the London criteria were also applied. Of 38 interim scans, agreement was complete in 68% and 71% by ECOG and London criteria, respectively. The range of PET+ interim scans was 16% to 34% (P = not significant) by reviewer. Moderate consistency of reviews was observed: kappa statistic = 0.445 using ECOG criteria, and kappa statistic = 0.502 using London criteria. These data, showing only moderate reproducibility among nuclear medicine experts, indicate the need to standardize PET interpretation in research and practice. This trial was registered at www.clinicialtrials.gov as #NCT00274924. (Blood. 2010;115:775-777)
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 777
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Cashen A, 2008, BLOOD, V112, P144
  • [2] Response assessment after an inductive CHOP or CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab in 103 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrating 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the International Workshop Criteria
    Dupuis, J.
    Itti, E.
    Rahmouni, A.
    Hemery, F.
    Gisselbrecht, C.
    Lin, C.
    Copie-Bergman, C.
    Belhadj, K.
    El Gnaoui, T.
    Gaillard, I.
    Kuhnowski, F.
    Meignan, M.
    Haioun, C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (03) : 503 - 507
  • [3] [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma:: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome
    Haioun, C
    Itti, E
    Rahmouni, A
    Brice, P
    Rain, JD
    Belhadj, K
    Gaulard, P
    Garderet, L
    Lepage, E
    Reyes, F
    Meignan, M
    [J]. BLOOD, 2005, 106 (04) : 1376 - 1381
  • [4] High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens
    Han, H. S.
    Escalon, M. P.
    Hsiao, B.
    Serafini, A.
    Lossos, I. S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (02) : 309 - 318
  • [5] Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in lymphoma
    Juweid, Malik E.
    Stroobants, Sigrid
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Mottaghy, Felix M.
    Dietlein, Markus
    Guermazi, Ali
    Wiseman, Gregory A.
    Kostakoglu, Lale
    Scheidhauer, Klemens
    Buck, Andreas
    Naumann, Ralph
    Spaepen, Karoline
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Reske, Sven N.
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Zijlstra, Josee M.
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Cheson, Bruce D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 571 - 578
  • [6] Quantitative duplex PCR of Clostridium botulinum types A and B neurotoxin genes
    Kasai, Yoshiaki
    Kimura, Bon
    Tajima, Yosuke
    Fujii, Tateo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE FOOD HYGIENIC SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2007, 48 (01): : 19 - 26
  • [7] Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma:: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis
    Lin, Chieh
    Itti, Emmanuel
    Haioun, Corinne
    Petegnief, Yolande
    Luciani, Alain
    Dupuis, Jehan
    Paone, Gaetano
    Talbot, Jean-Noel
    Rahmouni, Alain
    Meignan, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (10) : 1626 - 1632
  • [8] FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma
    Mikhaeel, NG
    Hutchings, M
    Fields, PA
    O'Doherty, MJ
    Timothy, AR
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (09) : 1514 - 1523
  • [9] Phase II trial of dose-dense R-CHOP followed by risk-adapted consolidation with either ICE or ICE and ASCT, based upon the results of biopsy confirmed abnormal interim restaging PET scan, improves outcome in patients with advanced stage DLBCL.
    Moskowitz, Craig
    Hamlin, Paul A.
    Horwitz, Steven M.
    Noy, Ariela
    O'Connor, Owen A.
    Palomba, M. Lia
    Portlock, Carol S.
    Straus, David J.
    Chennin-Lessac, Simone
    Weaver, Alandra
    Teruva-Feldstein, Julie
    Schoder, Heiko
    Zelenetz, Andrew D.
    [J]. BLOOD, 2006, 108 (11) : 161A - 161A
  • [10] RADFORD J, 2008, BLOOD, V112, P369