Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment

被引:106
作者
Glynn, SA
Williams, AE
Nass, CC
Bethel, J
Kessler, D
Scott, EP
Fridey, J
Kleinman, SH
Schreiber, GB
机构
[1] WESTAT Corp, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] US FDA, CBER, Off Blood Res & Review, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
[3] Amer Red Cross, Blood Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] New York Blood Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Blood Bank San Bernardino & Riverside Counties, San Bernardino, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first-time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Responses (encouraged, discouraged, no difference) to incentives were compared within demographic groups, donations sites, and between first-time and repeat community whole-blood (WB) donors using chi-square tests and logistic regressions adjusted for sample design. RESULTS: Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 45,588 WB respondents were blood credits (61%), cholesterol screening (61%), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening (73% of men). Younger donors (less than or equal to25 years old) were 4 to 5 times more likely to be encouraged to donate if offered compensatory incentives (tickets to events, discounts or lottery and/or raffle tickets), gifts, or a token of appreciation than were those donors older than 55. This age effect influenced positive attitudes toward incentives in first-time donors and in donors giving at schools, universities, or military sites. Among all donors, up to 7 to 9 percent reported they would be discouraged to return if offered compensatory incentives. CONCLUSIONS: Blood credits and cholesterol and PSA screening would be well received at all donation sites. Gifts, compensatory incentives, and tokens of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive resources more effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS AND SERUM HEPATITIS - USE OF MONOCHLOROACETATE AS AN ANTIBACTERIAL AGENT IN PLASMA [J].
ALLEN, JG ;
DAWSON, D ;
SAYMAN, WA ;
HUMPHREYS, EM ;
BENHAM, RS ;
HAVENS, I .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1959, 150 (03) :455-468
[2]  
ARONSON E, 1985, INTRINSIC MOTIVATION, P43
[3]  
Chrisman J C, 1988, MLO Med Lab Obs, V20, P51
[4]   PAID-VERSUS-VOLUNTEER BLOOD DONATION IN THE UNITED-STATES - A HISTORICAL REVIEW [J].
DOMEN, RE .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE REVIEWS, 1995, 9 (01) :53-59
[5]  
FELLEGI IP, 1980, J AM STAT ASSOC, V71, P665
[6]   THE USE OF INCENTIVES TO INCREASE BLOOD DONATIONS [J].
FERRARI, JR ;
BARONE, RC ;
JASON, LA ;
ROSE, T .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 125 (06) :791-793
[7]   Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons [J].
Glynn, SA ;
Kleinman, SH ;
Schreiber, GB ;
Zuck, T ;
Mc Combs, S ;
Bethel, J ;
Garratty, G ;
Williams, AE .
TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (02) :216-225
[8]   Repeat whole-blood and plateletpheresis donors: unreported deferrable risks, reactive screening tests, and response to incentive programs [J].
Glynn, SA ;
Smith, JW ;
Schreiber, GB ;
Kleinman, SH ;
Nass, CC ;
Bethel, J ;
Biswas, B ;
Thomson, RA ;
Williams, AE .
TRANSFUSION, 2001, 41 (06) :736-743
[9]   BEHAVIORAL-APPROACHES IN INCREASING BLOOD DONATIONS [J].
JASON, LA ;
JACKSON, K ;
OBRADOVIC, JL .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1986, 9 (04) :439-448