Comparison of 6 MV and 18 MV photons for IMRT treatment of lung cancer

被引:31
作者
Madani, Indira
Vanderstraeten, Barbara
Bral, Samuel
Coghe, Marc
De Gersem, Werner
De Wagter, Carlos
Thierens, Hubert
De Neve, Wilfried
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent VIB, Dept Phys Med, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
intensity modulated radiotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer; loss of electronic equilibrium;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background and purpose: To compare 6 MV and 18 MV photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer. Materials and methods: Doses for a cohort of 10 patients, typical for our department, were computed with a commercially available convolution/superposition (CS) algorithm. Final dose computation was also performed with a dedicated IMRT Monte Carlo dose engine (MCDE). Results: CS plans showed higher D-95% (Gy) for the GTV (68.13 vs 67.36, p = 0.004) and CTV (67.23 vs 66.87, p = 0.028) with 18 than with 6 MV photons. MCDE computations demonstrated higher doses with 6 MV than 18 MV in D95% for the PTV (64.62 vs 63.64, p = 0.009), PTVoptjm (65.48 vs 64.83, p = 0.014) and CTV (66.22 vs 65.64, p = 0.027). Dose inhomogeneity was lower with 18 than with 6 MV photons for GTV (0.08 vs 0.09, p = 0.007) and CTV (0.10 vs; 0.11, p = 0.045) in CS but not MCDE plans. 6 MV photons significantly (D-33%; p = 0.045) spared the esophagus in MCDE plans. Observed dose differences between lower and higher energy IMRT plans were dependent on the individual patient. Conclusions: Selection of photon energy depends on priority ranking of endpoints and individual patients. In the absence of highly accurate dose computation algorithms such as CS and MCDE, 6 MV photons may be the prudent choice. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose [J].
Arnfield, MR ;
Siantar, CH ;
Siebers, J ;
Garmon, P ;
Cox, L ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) :1266-1274
[2]
Comparison between a conventional treatment energy and 50 MV photons for the treatment of lung tumours [J].
Blomquist, M ;
Li, JS ;
Ma, CM ;
Zackrisson, B ;
Karlsson, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (06) :889-897
[3]
Leaf position optimization for step-and-shoot IMRT [J].
De Gersem, W ;
Claus, F ;
De Wagter, C ;
Van Duyse, B ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1371-1388
[4]
An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer [J].
De Gersem, W ;
Claus, F ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03) :849-859
[5]
Inhomogeneous target-dose distributions: A dimension more for optimization? [J].
De Gersem, WRT ;
Derycke, S ;
Colle, CO ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, WJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (02) :461-468
[6]
De Neve W, 2006, IMAGE-GUIDED IMRT, P47
[7]
Lethal pneumonitis in a phase I study of chemotherapy and IMRT for NSCLC: The need to investigate the accuracy of dose computation [J].
De Neve, W ;
De Wagter, C .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 75 (02) :246-247
[8]
Reduction of target dose inhomogeneity in IMRT treatment planning using biologic objective functions - In response [J].
De Neve, W ;
De Gersem, W ;
De Meerleer, G ;
Claus, F ;
De Wagter, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05) :1519-1520
[9]
Clinical delivery of intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy for relapsed or second-primary head and neck cancer using a multileaf collimator with dynamic control [J].
De Neve, W ;
De Gersem, W ;
Derycke, S ;
De Meerleer, G ;
Moerman, M ;
Bate, MT ;
Van Duyse, B ;
Vakaet, L ;
De Deene, Y ;
Mersseman, B ;
De Wagter, C .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 50 (03) :301-314
[10]
De Smedt B, 2005, PHYS MED BIOL, V50, P5935, DOI [10.1088/0031-9155/50/012, 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/012]