The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement systemin measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects

被引:84
作者
Jordan, K
Dziedzic, K
Jones, PW
Ong, BN
Dawes, PT
机构
[1] Univ Keele, Ctr Hlth Planning & Management, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[2] Univ Keele, Dept Math, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[3] Univ Keele, Primary Care Sci Res Ctr, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[4] Univ Keele, Dept Physiotherapy Studies, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[5] Staffordshire Rheumatol Ctr, Stoke On Trent ST6 7AG, Staffs, England
关键词
cervical spine; shoulder; range of motion; FASTRAK; reliability;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/39.4.382
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. To assess the inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of a new three-dimensional measurement system, the FASTRAK, in measuring cervical spine flexion/ extension. lateral flexion and rotation and shoulder flexion/extension, abduction and external rotation in healthy subjects. Methods. The study was conducted in two parts. One part assessed inter-observer reliability with two observers measuring 40 subjects. The other part assessed intra-observer reliability with one observer measuring 32 subjects on three occasions. All subjects had unrestricted, pain-free cervical spine and shoulder movement. Reliability was measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)]. Results. The inter-observer ICCs for the cervical spine ranged from 0.61 to 0.89 and for the shoulder from 0.68 to 0.75. After removal of outliers, all ICCs were above 0.70. Intraobserver ICCs for the cervical spine ranged from 0.54 to 0.82 and for the shoulder from 0.62 to 0.81. After removal of outliers, all ICCs were above 0.70 except for shoulder abduction (0.62). Conclusions. Whilst all movements measured by the FASTRAK showed good reliability, the reliability of the whole movement in a plane (e.g. left plus right lateral flexion) was better than for the separate movements (e.g. left and right lateral flexion taken separately). Interobserver reliability was generally better than intra-observer reliability for most cervical spine movements, suggesting that variability of movement within subjects (e.g. over a period of days) for these movements was greater than variability between measures on the same occasion.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 388
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
BALOGUN J A, 1989, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, V10, P248
[2]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]
RELIABILITY OF GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
BOONE, DC ;
AZEN, SP ;
LIN, CM ;
SPENCE, C ;
BARON, C ;
LEE, L .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1978, 58 (11) :1355-1360
[4]
EFFECT OF REGRESSION TO MEAN IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND CLINICAL STUDIES [J].
DAVIS, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1976, 104 (05) :493-498
[5]
SAMPLE-SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIABILITY STUDIES [J].
DONNER, A ;
ELIASZIW, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :441-448
[6]
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR THE CONCURRENT ASSESSMENT OF INTERRATER AND INTRARATER RELIABILITY - USING GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS AS AN EXAMPLE [J].
ELIASZIW, M ;
YOUNG, SL ;
WOODBURY, MG ;
FRYDAYFIELD, K .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (08) :777-788
[7]
A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability [J].
Green, S ;
Buchbinder, R ;
Forbes, A ;
Bellamy, N .
ARTHRITIS CARE AND RESEARCH, 1998, 11 (01) :43-52
[8]
Greene WB., 1994, The Clinical Measurement of Joint Motion
[9]
HAAS M, 1991, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V14, P119
[10]
Hole D E, 1995, Man Ther, V1, P36, DOI 10.1054/math.1995.0248