The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: an investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level

被引:32
作者
Gupta, N [1 ]
Bisantz, AM
Singh, T
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Ind Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0144929021000013473
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study addresses the issues concerning the design of adverse condition warning systems (ACWS). ACWS are designed to sense adverse road and weather conditions as well as system states that can negatively impact driving performance leading to skids or accidents, and alert drivers to these conditions. In this case, an ACWS was designed to sense when a car was likely to skid. A virtual-driving environment was used to test two levels of alarm sensitivity (low and high) and two types of auditory alarm signal (Binary ON/OFF and Graded) along with a no-alarm control group. Dependent measures reflected driver performance, response to the alarm signal and trust in the alerting system. Results indicated that participants had fewer skids in the low sensitivity and graded alarm signal condition compared to some other alerting system configurations. Participants in the graded alarm signal condition also had a greater degree of lateral control over the vehicle. Additionally, trust was found to be lower for the high vs. low sensitivity alarm condition, indicating a reduction in trust when the alerting system activated more often, perhaps because participants did not feel the system was accurately reflecting a dangerous condition. This simulator-based research emphasizes the fact that while ACWS may provide an advantage in terms of vehicle control, characteristics of both the alerting signal and system configuration should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 248
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ALLEN RW, 1991, SAE TECHNICAL PAPER, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J COGNITIVE ERGO, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, 82017 CIV AV AUTH
[4]  
Barfield W, 1998, HUMAN FACTORS INTELL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315806624
[5]  
Bois W., 1982, IEEE 1982 Workshop on Automotive Application of Microprocessors, P88
[6]  
Bonsall P., 1991, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1306, P59
[7]  
Dingus T. A., 1998, HUM FAC TRANSP, P55
[8]   Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices [J].
Dingus, TA ;
McGehee, DV ;
Manakkal, N ;
Jahns, SK ;
Carney, C ;
Hankey, JM .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1997, 39 (02) :216-229
[9]  
DINGUS TA, 1993, DESIGNING FOR DIVERSITY, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1067
[10]  
DOLL TJ, 1984, AUDITORY INFORMATION